|
[Sponsors] |
January 11, 2019, 04:41 |
reactingFoam faster on less CPUs
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello,
I am running a LES combustion case with PaSR (22 species, 124 reactions) on OpenFOAM 6. I tried to run the simulation on 80 CPUs and 16 CPUs. I have discovered that the simulation with less CPUs was running way faster than the other one. The bottleneck is in the calculation of the comustion/chemistry. Can anybody tell me why this is happening? Greetings sufjanst |
|
January 11, 2019, 12:00 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 15 |
1. how many physical cores does the machine have?
2. Have you carried out a scaling study by looking at the speed-up vs Ncores -- typically increasing one node at a time (not core)? |
|
January 12, 2019, 09:26 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Peter Baskovich
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 12 |
Are you renumbering the mesh? What is the interconnect?
What is the decomposition method? How many cells? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to switch off combustion and reaction in reactingFoam | shenzhou1987 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | October 26, 2017 16:31 |
strange processor boundary behavior in foam-extend reactingFOAM | Neka | OpenFOAM Bugs | 8 | August 16, 2017 08:13 |
What do you all do to stabilize reactingFoam (or in general)? | KarenRei | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | December 11, 2016 15:34 |
Flamelet gives faster chemistry than ED-model | champshof | FLUENT | 0 | November 30, 2011 11:01 |
reactingFoam wedge handling wrong U | dhondupant | OpenFOAM Bugs | 1 | December 9, 2010 08:34 |