|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Peter Shi
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Davis
Posts: 102
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Hi all,
I have flows around an airfoil at moderate Reynolds numbers, and I am going to use LES to obtain the flow field. I would like to hear some comparison, user experience, etc. in terms of PimpleFoam vs. PisoFoam. Note, I have read previous posts about the similar questions already. My take-away is PimpleFoam is able to have large time steps and seem to be more robust and efficient. My concern about PimpleFoam is, I think PimpleFoam is not really “transient", I mean the algorithm seeks a steady state for several iterations in one time step. I am not sure what is the impact bu doing this (besides making codes more stable), and does it make sense in physics? In my case, I do not need a large time step, what matters most is the accuracy of my simulation. Any inputs are highly appreciated! Best regards, Peter |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differences in solution method for pisoFoam and buoyantBoussinesqPisoFoam | mchurchf | OpenFOAM | 7 | August 6, 2023 09:12 |
Error while running pisoFoam with snappy but ran smoothly without snappy in empty dm | faiazk | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | October 24, 2018 13:51 |
How can I get stedaystate solution from pisoFoam? | mykkujinu2201 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | December 8, 2015 07:37 |
pisoFoam, pimpleFoam - Fluent user's questions | RodriguezFatz | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | September 4, 2013 04:26 |
pisoFoam compiling error with OF 1.7.1 on MAC OSX | Greg Givogue | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 3 | March 4, 2011 17:18 |