|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Peter Shi
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Davis
Posts: 102
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Hi Foamers,
I simulated a NACA0012 airfoil, AOA=0, and U=56 m/s using simpleFoam as my solver. The turbulence model I used is KomegaSST. I assume in this way, the boundary layer is fully turbulent. However, as shown in the screenshot below, I still observe a "jump" indicating transition in the Cf (the skin friction coefficient). If the BL is fully turbulent, there should not be a "jump" here, Cf should be decreasing all the way to the trailing edge. My question is: is KomegaSST in OpenFOAM (I use OpenFOAM 5.0) a fully turbulent model? If not, how can I make fully turbulent simulations? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Peter |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ffd_control_point_2d | feiyi | SU2 | 4 | September 30, 2019 12:42 |
DNS of a Fully Developed Turbulent Pipe Flow | abdulra5 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | August 30, 2018 06:15 |
3D pipe flow - Using UDF's to define fully developed turbulent flow on the inlet | Taz-CFD | ANSYS | 0 | February 19, 2016 07:49 |
Fully Developed Turbulent Flow Mesh Convergence | deji | OpenFOAM | 0 | November 25, 2011 20:27 |
UDF for fully developed turbulent pipe flow | Maged | FLUENT | 1 | June 11, 2005 10:37 |