|
[Sponsors] |
SA-DDES Validation laminar or turbulent flow? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 23, 2018, 15:50 |
SA-DDES Validation laminar or turbulent flow?
|
#1 |
New Member
Davide
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 9 |
Dear Foamers,
I am working on my master thesis where I try to validate some hybrid RANS LES models. Right now I am simulating the flow past a cylinder at RE = 140k with SA-DDES (spalart allmaras detached eddy simulation). I found that this work has already been done in the article "Detached-Eddy Simulations Past a Circular Cylinder" by "ANDREI TRAVIN, MICHAEL SHUR, MICHAEL STRELETS and PHILIPPE SPALART". The authors found out that setting at the inlet nutilda = 0 the model provides a flow which is laminar (and comparable with experimental results at RE= 140k) while providing a non zero value of nutilda makes the simulation turbulent. In my simulation I obtained the exact same cp and cf profiles they got for the turbulent case (inlet nutilda !=0) but when trying to "force" the simulation to stay laminar imposing nutilda=0 I get completely different profiles. Does anybody know If this discrepancy is caused by OpenFoam implementation of SA? Or more generally does anyone have a clue about why this is happening? Could it be caused by the fact I am using a DDES model rather than a DES ? (I don't think so) Thanks in advance Davide |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
turbulent pipe flow result validation | preetam69 | FLUENT | 1 | February 22, 2018 22:53 |
Turbulent or laminar flow | yansheng | STAR-CCM+ | 4 | July 1, 2016 18:53 |
Ratio of eddy viscosity to molecular viscosity : Laminar or turbulent flow? | JuPa | CFX | 7 | September 9, 2013 08:45 |
Laminar flow or Turbulent flow | mech | FLUENT | 0 | January 27, 2007 19:51 |
Validation case for turbulent flow | Ratan | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 4, 2005 04:03 |