|
[Sponsors] |
actual flow rate not match the designed flow rate in ventilation modeling |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 18, 2018, 08:10 |
actual flow rate not match the designed flow rate in ventilation modeling
|
#1 |
New Member
Pu Gong
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: London
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi foamers
I am doing a displacement ventilation modeling of a single office with a seated occupants which generating heat thermal plume using buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam. The inlet and outlet size are both 0.2×0.2=0.04m2, the inlet velocity is 0.25m/s, hence as my expect the volume flow rate of inlet (designed flow rate) and outlet should be 0.01m3/s, or 10L/s. However, the actual volume flow rate result from flow rate monitor is 9L/s. Anyone please help how can I make the actual flow rate the same as designed value? |
|
November 18, 2018, 09:11 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Peter Baskovich
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 12 |
Are you using fluxCorrected boundary conditions?
Please post more info, whole case is good in a zip or post the 0 folder and boundary files to start with. |
|
November 18, 2018, 13:37 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Pu Gong
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: London
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Thanks for your reply. Please check my U, T and P-rgh files. And what you mean by the fluxCorrected boundary condition? Is it a inlet outlet boundary condition that can be identified in the U file? Cheers Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volVectorField; object U; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (0 0 0); boundaryField { inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform (0.25 0 0); } outlet { type inletOutlet; inletValue uniform (0 0 0); value uniform (0 0 0); } top { type noSlip; } bottom { type noSlip; } wall { type noSlip; } desk { type noSlip; } human { type noSlip; } } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; object T; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 0 0 1 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 298.15; boundaryField { inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 298.15; } outlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 298.15; } top { type fixedValue; value uniform 298.15; } bottom { type fixedValue; value uniform 298.15; } wall { type fixedValue; value uniform 298.15; } desk { type fixedValue; value uniform 298.15; } human { type fixedValue; value uniform 298.15; } } Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; object p_rgh; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0; boundaryField { inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 0; } outlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 0; } top { type fixedFluxPressure; rho rhok; value uniform 0; } bottom { type fixedFluxPressure; rho rhok; value uniform 0; } wall { type fixedFluxPressure; rho rhok; value uniform 0; } desk { type fixedFluxPressure; rho rhok; value uniform 0; } human { type fixedFluxPressure; rho rhok; value uniform 0; } } |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flow rate restriction simulation set-up | siw | CFX | 4 | February 16, 2016 13:15 |
CFD Modeling of Two-phase Flow in Small Dia.Tubes | Eric Poindexter | Main CFD Forum | 2 | September 22, 2000 10:21 |
fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 22:31 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (CFX4.2) | HB &DS | CFX | 0 | January 9, 2000 14:19 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) | DS & HB | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2000 16:00 |