|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Pu Gong
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: London
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Hi guys,
I was modeling a ventilated room with a inlet and outlet at the top. When I was using pimpleFoam, everything went well. The air went in and out through inlet and outlet. However, when I changed the solver to buoyantPimpleFoam, things were totally out of control: There was totally no air went out through the preset outlet, but instead an unknown outlet was found at the bottom corner wall of the room. I call it a ghost like outlet since I have no clue how it shows up in my model, I have checked all of my settings including the geomtry mesh setup and there is no geomtry or code about "generating a outlet at the corner". Anyone could help plz??? This almost drives me mad! ghost like outlet.png the ghost like outlet normal1.png the normal inlet and outlet normal.png the normal inlet and outlet |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
New Member
Pu Gong
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: London
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Anybody could help? There seems to be another similar problem occured when others using buoyantPimpleFoam. buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam makes a random cell an outlet
should this be a bug of the solver? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,978
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quick answers:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
New Member
Pu Gong
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: London
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Hi Bruno
Thanks for your reply and tips on how to get help! Also I want to correct my post that the solver I used is the buoyantBousinesqPimepleFoam rather than the buoyantPimpleFoam. Yes I did find that this unknown outlet is caused by boundry setting.The orignal U for inlet is (0 0 -0.1) and for outlet is zero gradient. I found that if I change the outlet U to the fixed value (0 0 0.1), then the unknown outlet disappeared and the U and T field in the room looked reasonable. In this study I am focusing on the CO2 concentration under different air flow rather than the ventilation itself, so it seems that fixed velocity for inlet and outlet can totally satisfied the need of this study. But it is approparite to use such settings? Since there seems no openfoam tutorial using a fixed velocity outlet. And considering buoyantBousinesqPimepleFoam is not a completely incompressible solver, should I use a "pressure based inlet" rather than a "velocity based inlet" ? Cheers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
My 2c:
It is not possible to get a well thought answer if you don't describe your problem in a complete way. May be, such a description helps yourself understanding your problem. I assume that you know that the buoyant solvers requires p_rgh instead of p? The solver tends to numerical errors in recirculation areas. I don't know whether this is your problem. But if, you may split the calculation in a flow part and a diffusion part - making two independend simulations. This is possible because your flow does not depend on the diffusion (as far as I understand your case).
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
New Member
Pu Gong
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: London
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Hi Uwe
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I found that the problem was totally caused by p_rgh setting, and it had been solved by change the inlet and outlet p_rgh from fixedFlux to fixed value. Split the simulation into two parts seems worth to try! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inconsistencies in reading .dat file during run time in new injection model | Scram_1 | OpenFOAM | 0 | March 23, 2018 22:29 |
How to calculate particle size at outlet of a 3D nozzle model in fluent? | nishu3210 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 21, 2015 13:54 |
manualInjection model in sprayFoam | Mentalo | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | April 2, 2014 09:29 |
one phase outlet VOF - Model | Jim87 | FLUENT | 6 | November 13, 2013 02:15 |
Question about outlet boundary condtion settting for transitional model | Anna Tian | CFX | 2 | March 3, 2013 18:35 |