CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

MULES or GAMG error, hull in waves

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 30, 2018, 12:30
Default MULES or GAMG error, hull in waves
  #1
New Member
 
tommaso acerbi
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
tomshutch is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I am running URANS simulations, interdymfoam solver in OF5.0, to evaluate wave impact loads on a yacht sailing both in upright conditions and with an heeling angle.

Before implementing waves, I run a simil-steadystate simulation, fixed geometry with interfoam, to develop the flow around the hull and obtain a stable solution. After that I switch to interdymfoam, release pitch, heave, roll and yaw two at a time and again run until I obtain again a stable solution.
The two cases have exactly the same set up except for the mesh, however, while the upright case runs with no problems, the heeled one gives a lot of troubles.
The domain is built with two adjacent inlets and two adjacent outlets because I saw this is the best way I can simulate oblique waves.
To model turbulence I use k-omega SST.

Since the upright case runs with no problems in waves, I believe that the problem is not in the boundary or initial conditions, but is a matter of mesh quality and linear solvers.
The simulations crash giving the following error

Code:
Courant Number mean: 0.000203452 max: 4652.73
Interface Courant Number mean: 3.34743e-05 max: 4652.73
deltaT = 8.8832e-09
Time = 145.747

PIMPLE: iteration 1
forces forces:
    Not including porosity effects
Restraint heelingAngle:  angle 0.418438 moment (1.17675e+06 0 0)
Restraint heading:  angle 0.0017102 moment (0 0 -171020)
6-DoF rigid body motion
    Centre of rotation: (-17.53 0 1.04225)
    Centre of mass: (-17.53 0 1.04225)
    Orientation: (0.999727 -0.00156266 -0.0232849 -0.00803394 0.913724 -0.406256 0.0219108 0.406334 0.913463)
    Linear velocity: (0 0 0.935723)
    Angular velocity: (-0.0433544 -0.184461 0.301831)
Execution time for mesh.update() = 0.99 s
smoothSolver:  Solving for alpha.water, Initial residual = 1.83736e-09, Final residual = 3.84139e-13, No Iterations 4
Phase-1 volume fraction = 0.777394  Min(alpha.water) = -0.00342231  Max(alpha.water) = 1.00001
Applying the previous iteration compression flux
MULES: Correcting alpha.water
MULES: Correcting alpha.water
MULES: Correcting alpha.water
MULES: Correcting alpha.water
Phase-1 volume fraction = 0.777394  Min(alpha.water) = -0.00307888  Max(alpha.water) = 1.00001
smoothSolver:  Solving for alpha.water, Initial residual = 1.71623e-09, Final residual = 2.13096e-13, No Iterations 4
Phase-1 volume fraction = 0.777394  Min(alpha.water) = -0.000831378  Max(alpha.water) = 1.00001
Applying the previous iteration compression flux
MULES: Correcting alpha.water
MULES: Correcting alpha.water
MULES: Correcting alpha.water
MULES: Correcting alpha.water
Phase-1 volume fraction = 0.777394  Min(alpha.water) = -0.00057803  Max(alpha.water) = 1.00001
GAMG:  Solving for p_rgh, Initial residual = 0.720243, Final residual = 2.90107e+78, No Iterations 1000
time step continuity errors : sum local = 3.03974e+71, global = 6.9005e+67, cumulative = 6.9005e+67
[3] #0  [2] Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&)#0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) at ??:?
[3] #1  Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) at ??:?
[2] #1  Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) at ??:?
[3] #2  ? at ??:?
[2] #2  ? in "/lib64/libpthread.so.0"
[2] #3  Foam::GAMGSolver::scale(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::lduMatrix const&, Foam::FieldField<Foam::Field, double> const&, Foam::UPtrList<Foam::lduInterfaceField const> const&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const in "/lib64/libpthread.so.0"
[3] #3  Foam::GAMGSolver::scale(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::lduMatrix const&, Foam::FieldField<Foam::Field, double> const&, Foam::UPtrList<Foam::lduInterfaceField const> const&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const at ??:?
[2] #4  Foam::GAMGSolver::Vcycle(Foam::PtrList<Foam::lduMatrix::smoother> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, unsigned char) const at ??:?
[3] #4  Foam::GAMGSolver::Vcycle(Foam::PtrList<Foam::lduMatrix::smoother> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, Foam::PtrList<Foam::Field<double> >&, unsigned char) const at ??:?
[2] #5  Foam::GAMGSolver::solve(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const at ??:?
[3] #5  Foam::GAMGSolver::solve(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const at ??:?
[2] #6  Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solveSegregated(Foam::dictionary const&) at ??:?
[3] #6  Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solveSegregated(Foam::dictionary const&) at ??:?
[2] #7   at ??:?
[3] #7  Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve(Foam::dictionary const&)Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve(Foam::dictionary const&) at ??:?
[2] #8   at ??:?
[3] #8  ?? at ??:?
[2] #9  __libc_start_main at ??:?
[3] #9  __libc_start_main in "/lib64/libc.so.6"
[3] #10   in "/lib64/libc.so.6"
[2] #10  ?? at ??:?
 at ??:?
To get rid of the GAMG error I tried to switch to PCG to solve pressure and introduce nonOrthogonalCorrectors, with the only result that the simulations crash a couple of seconds later than with GAMG, but with a MULES error.

Given that, I created a completely new (better) mesh for the heeled case and rerun the fixed hull case first. Again this first step runs smoothly, however when I switch solver and release the first two degrees of freedom (pitch and heave) it stops again with a sudden MULES error, as in the attachment interDyMFoam.c, or a GAMG error as the previously posted.


at the link

https://1drv.ms/f/s!As9yywBJJOyYpQDp9ieKkZhPs2zs

I uploaded folders with the two cases (heel_waves with the GAMG error, and heel_dynamic with the refined mesh and MULES error), complete with all the dictionaries and logs, so that if someone is interested and has time it is possible to give it a look and maybe get back with suggestions. I cannot upload the .stl files due to confidentiality, but if needed I can upload pictures of the mesh.

Please let me know if I missed something in the description of the problem

Regards,
Tommaso
Attached Files
File Type: c interDyMFoam.c (81.9 KB, 1 views)
File Type: c log_checkMesh_allTopallGeo.c (5.5 KB, 1 views)
File Type: c fvSolution.c (2.6 KB, 3 views)
File Type: c fvSchemes.c (1.6 KB, 2 views)
tomshutch is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
fvsolutions, gamg, interdymfoam, mules


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suppress twoPhaseEulerFoam energy AlmostSurelyRob OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 33 September 25, 2018 18:45
Free surface issues with interDyMFoam for hydroturbine oumnion OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 October 6, 2017 15:05
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam turbulent case Aditya Patil OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 April 24, 2017 23:13
pimpleFoam: turbulence->correct(); is not executed when using residualControl hfs OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 October 29, 2013 09:35
Differences between serial and parallel runs carsten OpenFOAM Bugs 11 September 12, 2008 12:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48.