|
[Sponsors] |
Pressure Driven Supersonic Flow in Coverging-Diverging Nozzle (Wind Tunnel) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 16, 2018, 13:23 |
Pressure Driven Supersonic Flow in Coverging-Diverging Nozzle (Wind Tunnel)
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 8 |
I have been trying to run this Mach 2.5 supersonic nozzle through OpenFoam and can't seem to figure out the correct boundary conditions. For reference, this is a nozzle that is attached to the 15cm x 15cm supersonic wind tunnel at NASA GRC.
Boundary conditions are:
After trying out a large number of combinations of boundary conditions (read as 50+), this following one seems to work the best: Pressure, p Code:
{ internalField uniform 238559; boundaryField inlet { type totalPressure; gamma 1.4; p0 uniform 238559; value $internalField; } outlet { type waveTransmissive; gamma 1.4; fieldInf 12272.7; lInf 0.005; value uniform 12272.7; } nozzle { type zeroGradient; } } Temperature, T Code:
{ inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 348.432; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } nozzle { type zeroGradient; } } Velocity, U (changing the wall condition from slip to noSlip seems to not make a big difference with the centerline velocity) Code:
{ inlet { type zeroGradient; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } nozzle { type noSlip; } } I get an outlet centerline velocity of around 630m/s or about Mach 1.83, which is definitely not correct. Do any of you guys have any suggestions as to what is wrong and why I am not getting Mach 2.5? Also, why do I have to use waveTransmissive instead of fixedValue for the outlet pressure? If I use fixedValue, I get a huge velocity discontinuity at the outlet. My case file exceeds the attachment limit, so I have, instead, put them in my Google Drive, accessible here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YQ...T9sU9mh8mpQw8h Thanks in advance for the help. I have been staring at this for the past 2 weeks, making little progress if any, albeit learning a lot about OpenFoam. |
|
March 1, 2019, 05:56 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lukas Fischer
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Germany, Munich
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi Shang,
why did you choose the value of lInf? What does it represent for you? What Solver are you using? I must be a compressible one. The waveTransmissive boundary condition is important to let pressure waves exit your CFD domain. Otherwise they get reflected and influence your solution. What is your progress? Lukas |
|
Tags |
converging-diverging, nozzle, nozzle analysis, nozzle simulation, supersonic |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure Driven Supersonic Flow in Converging-Diverging Nozzle | cdm | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | August 28, 2019 02:37 |
Pressure Outlet Targeted Mass Flow Rate | LuckyTran | FLUENT | 1 | November 23, 2016 11:40 |
Discrepancy in Pressure Driven Flow Behaviour in 211 vs 221 | cdm | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | December 17, 2013 08:48 |
Supersonic Inlet for a Compressible Flow in a Nozzle | Daco | FLUENT | 8 | November 8, 2012 04:34 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) | DS & HB | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2000 16:00 |