|
[Sponsors] |
cyclone-case with lower outlet using simpleReactingFoam (steady-state) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 10, 2018, 18:12 |
cyclone-case with lower outlet using simpleReactingFoam (steady-state)
|
#1 |
Member
Jan Goebel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mannheim, Baden Wuerttemberg, Germany
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear community,
I'm currently trying to solve the cyclone case with a lower outlet using simpleReactingParcelFoam for a steady-state case with lagrangian particle tracking. As for a first step I modified the verticalChannel tutorial case to the cyclone boundaries with it's standard thermophysical model and ajusted it to my flow rate, but unfortunately it's diverging after 20 iterations throwing out the following error message: Code:
Maximum number of iterations exceeded: 100 In my case I have two outlets and want the solver to calculate the concentration accordingly. Does anybody know the correct settings for the outlet for this case ? Attached to this post I'll send you my boundary settings for the initial fields, maybe that helps. Thank you in advance, Jan |
|
April 11, 2018, 08:23 |
complete case file
|
#2 |
Member
Jan Goebel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mannheim, Baden Wuerttemberg, Germany
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 17 |
Unfortunately I still couldn' t spot out the error. If I run the case with the default thermophysical properties from the verticalChannel tutorial case it's still diverging. Checking out the output for pmin/pmax it can be observed, that the pressure field diverges.
When I change the material properties to my own created thermophysical properties, I get the error message, that specie- keyword is not defined (even though it is) |
|
April 17, 2018, 00:59 |
|
#3 |
Member
Kirk Jarvis
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 17 |
The phaseChangeModel in the reactingCloudProperties is set to liquid evaporation. Look at the air flows at the inlet along mass rates of reacting cloud are ratio'ed correctly or it will blow up quickly. You can use none for the phaseChangeModel which may help you get to a running model quick then add the evaporation model if you need it. As far as using your properties it doesn't appear you are using the right thermoType mixture for the solver. I didn't have any luck using multiComponetMixture, it needed to be reactingMixture. Also the error message regarding specie (with your own properties), since you are not using the reactingMixture (as mentioned above) it doesn't read the foamChemistryFiles files you need to put all the information in the thermophysicalProperites file.
For example: Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 5 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "constant"; object thermophysicalProperties; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // thermoType { type heRhoThermo; mixture multiComponentMixture; // couldn't get to work with simpleReactingParcelFoam transport const; thermo hConst; equationOfState incompressiblePerfectGas; specie specie; energy sensibleEnthalpy; } //chemistryReader foamChemistryReader; //foamChemistryFile "$FOAM_CASE/constant/reactions"; //foamChemistryThermoFile "$FOAM_CASE/constant/thermo.incompressiblePoly"; inertSpecie air; liquids { H2O; } solids {} species ( air H2O ); H2O { specie { nMoles 1; molWeight 18.0153; pRef 100000; } equationOfState { pRef 100000; } thermodynamics { Cp 4310; Hf 6.3225e+05; } transport { mu 1.825e-04; Pr 1.15; } } air { specie { nMoles 1; molWeight 18.0153; pRef 100000; } equationOfState { pRef 100000; } thermodynamics { // Cp 1007; Cp 2396; // Hf 2.257e+06; Hf 2.7459e+06; } transport { // mu 1.41e-05; mu 1.399e-05; // Pr 1; Pr 1.089; } } // ************************************************************************* // |
|
April 17, 2018, 06:06 |
reactingCloud1Properties
|
#4 |
Member
Jan Goebel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mannheim, Baden Wuerttemberg, Germany
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello Kirk,
thank you for your reply. I finally managed to run my own case by adjusting it to the proper material properties using the standard-steam tables. I also switched off the phase change modell to "none" as the only thing which is needed is the information about the particle behaviour at the wall. Unfortuntely by running different models varying the coefficients of e and mu for the wall behaviour there are no changes regarding the particle masses leaving and remaining into the vessel. It seems that this coefficients doesn't have any effect... Is there a good documentation available for the reactingCloud1Properties dict anywhre available- I've searched the web but couldn't find anything suitable. Have a nice day, Jan Last edited by jango; April 17, 2018 at 08:37. Reason: additional information added |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Case comparison of steady state and time-averaged transient solutions | k.vafiadis | CFX | 2 | October 20, 2012 06:37 |
Mass Diffusion: Transient and Steady State BC | rval | CFX | 3 | November 19, 2008 01:52 |
steady state, laminar vof_model | Garima Chaudhary | FLUENT | 0 | May 24, 2007 04:11 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |
About the difference between steady and unsteady problems | Lisa | Main CFD Forum | 11 | July 5, 2000 15:37 |