Accuracy when using upwind for interpolationSchemes in hypersonic flow

quarkz · January 30, 2018, 21:30

Hi,

I'm now running some hypersonic problems, such as double cone, concave ramp etc. In the interpolationSchemes, I used:

reconstruct(rho) upwind;
reconstruct(U) upwind;
reconstruct(T) upwind;

I tried all others but they caused the solution to diverge rather quickly. I even tried changing the scheme after running the upwind solution for a while, but the solution still diverges.

1st of all, am I restricted to using upwind scheme because it is upwind?
Secondly, is using the upwind scheme acceptable for accuracy?

Lastly, is there any other option I can do if my current accuracy is not acceptable?

Thanks.

Hillie · February 1, 2018, 19:32

Hi quarkz,

I assume you are running rhoCentral? I have found that Gamma schemes work best for the interpolation schemes. With the standard vanLeer interpolation the temperature solution isn't that great.
If your solution diverges with the other schemes then there is probably an other issue, which is hard to diagnose without more info.

quarkz · February 6, 2018, 08:30

Hi Hillie,

Thanks for the reply. I have tried most other changes, except for y+. The current grid is still too coarse in terms of y+. However, to reach y+ of even 50 at our Re, we will need maybe a few hundred millions to a billion, which is beyond our capability. We will try to see what else can be done.

January 30, 2018, 21:30	Accuracy when using upwind for interpolationSchemes in hypersonic flow	#1
quarkz Senior Member TWB Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 408 Rep Power: 19	Hi, I'm now running some hypersonic problems, such as double cone, concave ramp etc. In the interpolationSchemes, I used: reconstruct(rho) upwind; reconstruct(U) upwind; reconstruct(T) upwind; I tried all others but they caused the solution to diverge rather quickly. I even tried changing the scheme after running the upwind solution for a while, but the solution still diverges. 1st of all, am I restricted to using upwind scheme because it is upwind? Secondly, is using the upwind scheme acceptable for accuracy? Lastly, is there any other option I can do if my current accuracy is not acceptable? Thanks.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How is the accuracy using VOF (pressure based solver) on supersonic flow	air_fun	Fluent Multiphase	1	August 25, 2021 01:59
Hypersonic Flow simulation using Fluent	beanlee999	FLUENT	16	February 5, 2020 21:09
Review: Reversed flow	CRT	FLUENT	1	May 7, 2018 06:36
Solver for hypersonic flow in OpenFoam	Santos-Dumont	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	19	October 21, 2012 02:42
Hypersonic flow scramjet	ishaninair	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	0	March 10, 2011 08:45

February 1, 2018, 19:32		#2
Hillie Member Hilbert Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Australia Posts: 50 Rep Power: 11	Hi quarkz, I assume you are running rhoCentral? I have found that Gamma schemes work best for the interpolation schemes. With the standard vanLeer interpolation the temperature solution isn't that great. If your solution diverges with the other schemes then there is probably an other issue, which is hard to diagnose without more info.

February 6, 2018, 08:30		#3
quarkz Senior Member TWB Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 408 Rep Power: 19	Hi Hillie, Thanks for the reply. I have tried most other changes, except for y+. The current grid is still too coarse in terms of y+. However, to reach y+ of even 50 at our Re, we will need maybe a few hundred millions to a billion, which is beyond our capability. We will try to see what else can be done.