CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

best practice for relaxation factor in buoyant driven flow.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 28, 2017, 07:05
Default best practice for relaxation factor in buoyant driven flow.
  #1
New Member
 
Guolei
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14
wanggl is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am running buoyant driven flow using Openfoam. and find that even using relax_U=0.3 and relax_p=0.7, it still converged very slowly.
Anyone know how to speed up the convergence of buoyant driven flow?

Thanks in advance.
wanggl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2017, 11:10
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Taher Chegini
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 13
Taataa is on a distinguished road
It very much depends on the problem and how you setup a caselike schemes, solutions and so on. There are some default values though that could be a starting point:
for transients it's always 1 -> ".*" 1;
for non-transients: 0.3 for pressure and 0.7 for the rest.

Again, they are starting values and you should play with them. Ideally, you want set them as close as possible to 1.
Taataa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 1, 2018, 23:55
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Guolei
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14
wanggl is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taataa View Post
It very much depends on the problem and how you setup a caselike schemes, solutions and so on. There are some default values though that could be a starting point:
for transients it's always 1 -> ".*" 1;
for non-transients: 0.3 for pressure and 0.7 for the rest.

Again, they are starting values and you should play with them. Ideally, you want set them as close as possible to 1.
Thanks for your reply.
I use non-transient method to run the case, and see p=0.7 u=0.3 really the best choice. But the final residual (after 5000 iterations) of Uz is around 1E-3, while it is 5E-7 for TKE.
It is hard to say converged for Uz.
wanggl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2018, 02:36
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Taher Chegini
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 13
Taataa is on a distinguished road
Relaxation is only one of many parameters, you should consider changing linear solvers, tolerances and more importantly schemes. Since you didn't provide any details about the way you setup the case, it's not possible to provide more info.
Taataa is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery dowlee OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 August 6, 2021 07:40
Compressible Pressure Driven Flow mateiu2003k OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 August 24, 2016 07:00
Impellar driven fluid flow in centrifugal pump shivasluzz CFX 6 October 6, 2015 11:00
sonicFoam - pressure driven pipe: flow continuity violation and waveTransmissive BC Endel OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 September 11, 2014 17:29
CFX gravity driven free surface flow tutorial mechovator CFX 37 July 27, 2009 11:28


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:51.