|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Member
Gui Miotto
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hi, FluentStarter.
What meant is that maybe the code that you are using (reactingFOAM) can already output the mass flow rate "out of the box". In fact, reactingFOAM is a compressible simulator, therefore, Phi should already be the mass flow rate. Correct? (Check this table here: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Ug...able_of_fields) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Runtime using of patchIntegrate Untiity | harsha_kulkarni | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 5 | August 24, 2015 15:53 |
Interpreting PatchIntegrate Data | Gabbee90 | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 1 | December 5, 2014 16:45 |
patchIntegrate results? | MarEMotion | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 1 | December 5, 2014 16:36 |
patchIntegrate suggestion | rcastilla | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 0 | February 20, 2014 05:46 |
forces function VS patchIntegrate | andrea.pasquali | OpenFOAM | 13 | August 18, 2011 17:41 |