CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Inconsistency in Residence Time distribution using scalarTransportFoam

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 6, 2017, 05:33
Default Inconsistency in Residence Time distribution using scalarTransportFoam
  #1
Member
 
Sing
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 10
Struggle_Achieve is on a distinguished road
Hello Everyone,

I have been trying to complete one of my projects from past few months but I am stuck and I have tried several things but I am unable to resolve the issue. I will be immensely grateful if I may get some help.

I have obtained the TURBULENT flow field in a vessel (tundish) and using this velocity field I was trying to solve the Residence Time Distribution (RTD) analysis using the scalarTransportFoam solver.

My first doubt:
I have read some previous posts regarding the RTD analysis using Openfoam:

ScalarTransportFoam for RTD calculations

Here it is clearly mentioned that we have to modify the existing scalarTransportFoam solver to incorporate the turbulent diffusivity. But we are assuming our tracer (scalar) to be exactly similar like the fluid. So we are taking the diffusion coefficient to be ZERO. So my question is that given I am assuming zero diffusivity shall I have to modify the solver to take turbulent diffusion also?

We have used the default scalarTransportFoam solver to produce the RTD curve. At t=0 tracer is introduced from the inlet for 5 seconds and its concentration at the outlet is measured using function patchMassFlowAverage.

What troubles me is that for some specific vessel (tundish) designs the area under the curve (concentration at outlet vs time) is coming out to be greater than 5 which is not possible physically as the area under the curve of concentration at inlet vs time is 5.

Is this inconsistency arising due to ignoring the turbulent diffusion? Or this might be due to using improper schemes?
My fvSchemes file is like:
Code:
 /*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| =========                 |                                                 |
| \\      /  F ield         | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox           |
|  \\    /   O peration     | Version:  2.3.1                                 |
|   \\  /    A nd           | Web:      www.OpenFOAM.org                      |
|    \\/     M anipulation  |                                                 |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
    version     2.0;
    format      ascii;
    class       dictionary;
    location    "system";
    object      fvSchemes;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

ddtSchemes
{
    default         Euler;
}

gradSchemes
{
    default         none; //leastSquares; //Gauss linear;
    grad(T)	    cellMDLimited leastSquares 0;
}

divSchemes
{
    default         none;
    div(phi,T)      Gauss MUSCL;//upwind; //Gauss linearUpwind grad(T);
}

laplacianSchemes
{
    default         none;
    laplacian(DT,T) Gauss linear uncorrected; //Gauss linear corrected;
}

interpolationSchemes
{
    default         limitedCubic;//SuperBee;
}

snGradSchemes
{
    default         corrected;
}

fluxRequired
{
    default         no;
    T               ;
}


// ************************************************************************* //
Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks and Regards,
PS

Last edited by Struggle_Achieve; December 8, 2017 at 04:34.
Struggle_Achieve is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[General] Extracting ParaView Data into Python Arrays Jeffzda ParaView 30 November 6, 2023 22:00
AMI speed performance danny123 OpenFOAM 21 October 24, 2020 05:13
How to export time series of variables for one point? mary mor OpenFOAM Post-Processing 8 July 19, 2017 11:54
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 16:33
mixerVesselAMI2D's mass is not balancing sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 June 10, 2013 10:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:19.