|
[Sponsors] |
Inconsistency in Residence Time distribution using scalarTransportFoam |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 6, 2017, 05:33 |
Inconsistency in Residence Time distribution using scalarTransportFoam
|
#1 |
Member
Sing
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello Everyone,
I have been trying to complete one of my projects from past few months but I am stuck and I have tried several things but I am unable to resolve the issue. I will be immensely grateful if I may get some help. I have obtained the TURBULENT flow field in a vessel (tundish) and using this velocity field I was trying to solve the Residence Time Distribution (RTD) analysis using the scalarTransportFoam solver. My first doubt: I have read some previous posts regarding the RTD analysis using Openfoam: ScalarTransportFoam for RTD calculations Here it is clearly mentioned that we have to modify the existing scalarTransportFoam solver to incorporate the turbulent diffusivity. But we are assuming our tracer (scalar) to be exactly similar like the fluid. So we are taking the diffusion coefficient to be ZERO. So my question is that given I am assuming zero diffusivity shall I have to modify the solver to take turbulent diffusion also? We have used the default scalarTransportFoam solver to produce the RTD curve. At t=0 tracer is introduced from the inlet for 5 seconds and its concentration at the outlet is measured using function patchMassFlowAverage. What troubles me is that for some specific vessel (tundish) designs the area under the curve (concentration at outlet vs time) is coming out to be greater than 5 which is not possible physically as the area under the curve of concentration at inlet vs time is 5. Is this inconsistency arising due to ignoring the turbulent diffusion? Or this might be due to using improper schemes? My fvSchemes file is like: Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.3.1 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "system"; object fvSchemes; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // ddtSchemes { default Euler; } gradSchemes { default none; //leastSquares; //Gauss linear; grad(T) cellMDLimited leastSquares 0; } divSchemes { default none; div(phi,T) Gauss MUSCL;//upwind; //Gauss linearUpwind grad(T); } laplacianSchemes { default none; laplacian(DT,T) Gauss linear uncorrected; //Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default limitedCubic;//SuperBee; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } fluxRequired { default no; T ; } // ************************************************************************* // Thanks and Regards, PS Last edited by Struggle_Achieve; December 8, 2017 at 04:34. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[General] Extracting ParaView Data into Python Arrays | Jeffzda | ParaView | 30 | November 6, 2023 22:00 |
AMI speed performance | danny123 | OpenFOAM | 21 | October 24, 2020 05:13 |
How to export time series of variables for one point? | mary mor | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 8 | July 19, 2017 11:54 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
mixerVesselAMI2D's mass is not balancing | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | June 10, 2013 10:34 |