|
[Sponsors] |
Difference between faceCorrected and corrected surface normal gradient schemes |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 2, 2017, 11:02 |
Difference between faceCorrected and corrected surface normal gradient schemes
|
#1 |
New Member
Bhanu
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello everyone,
I need a help regarding the clarification of the order of accuracy and if possible mathematical implementation differences between faceCorrected and Corrected surface normal gradient scheme ? I am finding the face corrected scheme more stable than the latter. For complete description of the case and result, please refer this Difference between faceCorrected and corrected surface normal gradient schemes Thanks for your time. Edit: The links for schemes: faceCorrected - https://github.com/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM...orrectedSnGrad corrected - https://github.com/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM...orrectedSnGrad Best regards. Last edited by mugabe2204; November 2, 2017 at 11:03. Reason: more information |
|
March 4, 2020, 07:10 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
hello, have you find the difference. It seems the face gradient is recomputed by the node value, not by interpolation. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Difference between faceCorrected and corrected surface normal gradient schemes | mugabe2204 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | September 30, 2017 19:14 |