|
[Sponsors] |
Cut piece of simpleFoam solution for postProcessing |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 10, 2017, 06:06 |
Cut piece of simpleFoam solution for postProcessing
|
#1 |
Member
Sebastian Trunk
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Erlangen, Germany
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 11 |
Hey Foamers,
I have run a simpleFoam simulation of an internal pipe flow. Since the setup consists of repeated obstacles I want to cut out one repetitive element and run scalarTransportFoam on the smaller mesh. (See attached picture). I tried to map the fields with mapFields to the a mesh of the repetitive element, but I always get the following error: Code:
Source time: 0.1 Target time: 0.1 Create meshes Source mesh size: 20430247 Target mesh size: 1753323 Mapping fields for time 0.1 interpolating p #0 Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) at ??:? #1 Foam::sigSegv::sigHandler(int) at ??:? #2 ? in "/lib64/libc.so.6" #3 Foam::meshToMesh0::calculateInverseDistanceWeights() const at ??:? #4 Foam::meshToMesh0::inverseDistanceWeights() const at ??:? #5 ? at ??:? #6 ? at ??:? #7 ? at ??:? #8 ? at ??:? #9 ? at ??:? #10 __libc_start_main in "/lib64/libc.so.6" #11 ? at ??:? Segmentation fault Code:
Mesh stats points: 2193964 faces: 5623815 internal faces: 5195678 cells: 1753323 faces per cell: 6.17085 boundary patches: 7 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 0 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 1419493 prisms: 57879 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 4342 tetrahedra: 73 polyhedra: 271536 Breakdown of polyhedra by number of faces: faces number of cells 4 42311 5 49339 6 64796 7 10229 8 3530 9 53004 10 1244 11 735 12 34174 13 177 14 63 15 11570 16 6 18 358 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology inlet 50583 57911 ok (non-closed singly connected) outlet 50313 57594 ok (non-closed singly connected) yneg 27128 31221 ok (non-closed singly connected) ypos 27116 31169 ok (non-closed singly connected) xneg 27119 31159 ok (non-closed singly connected) xpos 27134 31127 ok (non-closed singly connected) lattice 218744 295009 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-0.005000008 -0.005000033 0.01499371) (0.00500001 0.005006101 0.0200002) Mesh has 3 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh has 3 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (-6.950294e-17 9.097023e-16 -2.955753e-15) OK. Max cell openness = 4.240475e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 6.275022 OK. Minimum face area = 1.045066e-11. Maximum face area = 2.01948e-08. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 2.395032e-16. Max volume = 2.015212e-12. Total volume = 3.813133e-07. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 64.1619 average: 10.9496 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 2.823711 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Mesh OK. End Can anybody tell me if this is possible in a different way and how? Thanks a lot for your help! Best regards, Sebastian |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2way FSi, Initialize with steady solution, Fluent, Transient Sturcural, System Coupli | mmkkeshavarzi | FLUENT | 1 | June 28, 2024 08:03 |
CFL Condition | Matt Umbel | Main CFD Forum | 19 | June 30, 2020 09:20 |
simpleFoam low Reynolds sphere noisy solution | aerospain | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | October 8, 2016 18:49 |
grid dependancy | gueynard a. | Main CFD Forum | 19 | June 27, 2014 22:22 |
Wall functions | Abhijit Tilak | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 5, 1999 02:16 |