|
[Sponsors] |
Static mixture with surfaceNormalFixedValue inlet condition |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 30, 2017, 10:53 |
Static mixture with surfaceNormalFixedValue inlet condition
|
#1 |
Senior Member
sunil
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello Everyone,
I am new to openFoam, I am trying to solve static mixture problem. Geometry is having two inlets and one outlet, inlets are at different temperature. I am using buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam solver. my solution is failing after the first iteration only with the following error ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> FOAM FATAL ERROR: Continuity error cannot be removed by adjusting the outflow. Please check the velocity boundary conditions and/or run potentialFoam to initialise the outflow. Total flux : 0.580728 Specified mass inflow : 3.1262 Specified mass outflow : 0 Adjustable mass outflow : 8.70037e-152 From function adjustPhi(surfaceScalarField&, const volVectorField&,volScalarField&) in file cfdTools/general/adjustPhi/adjustPhi.C at line 114. FOAM exiting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inlets are not aligned with the reference co-ordinate so I am using surfaceNormalFixedValue at the inlets, This condition is working well for simpleFoam. Help me to resolve this issue Regards, Sunil |
|
Tags |
continuity error |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure Inlet Boundary Condition Issue | zoeburton1987 | FLUENT | 0 | May 15, 2012 10:20 |
How to specify a mixture of gases at inlet boundary condition? | Matlab69 | FLUENT | 3 | April 24, 2012 07:08 |
How to set up the inlet boundary condition for a low pressure case? | beastieboys6 | FLUENT | 3 | April 10, 2012 23:46 |
Velocity inlet boundary condition for porous medium | Chander | CFX | 3 | March 11, 2012 22:18 |
why the static pressure in inlet of fans was high | jimmy | Fidelity CFD | 2 | October 10, 2003 08:25 |