|
[Sponsors] |
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam nonlinear heat conduction wrong temperature prediction |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 14, 2017, 04:10 |
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam nonlinear heat conduction wrong temperature prediction
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everybody,
as a preliminary work I am performing a validation of chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam for a simple nonlinear heat conduction problem. M. Danish et. al. developed an analytical solution for the 1D steady state heat conduction in a rod with linear varying heat conductivity. http://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCE...p2550-2555.pdf I face a problem that I need much more cells with the chtMRSF solver to predict the temperature profile and the wallHeatFlux as can be seen in this figure. nonLinearHeatConduction.png With ANSYS Fluent I am able to predict the wallHeatFlux quite good with even three cells. To get comparable results with chtMRSF I need 160 cells. Are there any improvements possible in my settings? I am using OF 5.0 and the case is based on the multiRegionHeaterRadiation tutorial. BottomAir is only a dummy, with no influence on the solid heater region. I have implemented the linear varying heat conductivity like this Code:
thermoType { ... transport polynomial; thermo hPolynomial; ... } mixture { ... transport { kappaCoeffs<8> (-58.8 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0); } thermodynamics { Hf 0; Sf 0; CpCoeffs<8> ( 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ); } ... } regards Björn |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel | kevinmccartin | CFX | 12 | October 13, 2022 22:43 |
Particle Tracking - Heat transfer and temperature | mxodio | CFX | 8 | August 7, 2015 13:43 |
Compression stoke is giving higher pressure than calculated | nickjuana | CFX | 62 | May 19, 2015 14:32 |
convergenceof natural convection prob. in cfx | cpkewat | CFX | 15 | January 31, 2014 07:29 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |