CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Mesh convergence study

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 4, 2017, 09:31
Default Mesh convergence study
  #1
Senior Member
 
kandelabr's Avatar
 
Nejc
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 196
Rep Power: 9
kandelabr is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I've been struggling to make my pump case run for well over six months now and now I decided to split my problem(s) into smaller ones, starting with meshing.

I made the simplest case I could think of: a sudden expansion joint, see attached pictures. To eliminate errors on the inlet edge I declared a 'slip' BC on a short section after inlet patch. I used k-omega SST turbulence model and wall functions. Boundary conditions are 1m/s inlet velocity and 0 outlet pressure, noSlip walls (except the mentioned patch).

I tried with a few different meshes:
- snappyHexMesh with 1, 0.5, 0.25 and 0.125mm 'smallest' cell without boundary layers
- cfMesh with 1x 1mm, 3x 0.5mm and 5x 0.3mm boundary cells
- cfMesh with 10x 8um boundary cells without wall functions

I also tried the cfMesh cells without turbulence modelling. All except one laminar case converged. Here are a few numbers I think are important:

Code:
mesh                min size    N*y+    Umax    pmin
snappy coarse       1mm                 1.074   -0.217
snappy medium       0.5mm               1.073   -0.213
snappy fine         0.25mm              1.083   -0.221
snappy extrafine    0.125mm             1.088   -0.225

coarse layers       1x 1mm      110     1.243   -0.237
medium layers       3x 0.5mm    54      1.1     -0.247
fine layers         5x 0.3mm    33      1.103   -0.241

no wall functions   10x 9um     1       1.087   -0.301

y+ = 9um
You can check all other results in attached PDF.
I now have no idea what the results mean. Are the results reasonable and which ones should be trusted most?

Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: png model.png (53.3 KB, 44 views)
File Type: png p-results.png (95.4 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg U-results.jpg (29.4 KB, 43 views)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf comparison.pdf (31.1 KB, 43 views)

Last edited by kandelabr; September 4, 2017 at 09:34. Reason: added BC explanations
kandelabr is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range vaina74 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 37 July 20, 2020 05:38
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 24 June 27, 2016 08:54
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes thomasnwalshiii OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 18 December 19, 2015 18:57
[snappyHexMesh] Layers:problem with curvature giulio.topazio OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 10 August 22, 2012 09:03
Need for Mesh Independence Study nickninevah Main CFD Forum 6 October 15, 2010 17:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:53.