|
[Sponsors] |
When can we decide a flow is unsteady or periodic? and How? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 26, 2017, 10:08 |
When can we decide a flow is unsteady or periodic? and How?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
vidyadhar
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi All,
I am running fluid(water) flow through a square channel at different Re. For small values of Re, I can observe that the streamlines are not changing with time (after certain duration of simulation) and I conclude that the flow has reached steady state. [Is it correct?] But, for higher values of Re, the streamlines are varying with time even after certain duration of simulation run. For how long should I run the simulation, at higher Re, to verify if the flow reaches steady state or if it remains unsteady? Or is there a way to decide that the flow will be in unsteady state or periodic (after certain Re). The mesh contains nearly 5 million cells. Regards, vidyadhar |
|
April 26, 2017, 10:28 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 15 |
> But, for higher values of Re, the streamlines are varying with time even after certain duration of simulation run. For how long should I run the simulation, at higher Re, to verify if the flow reaches steady state or if it remains unsteady?
First, this depends on your solver. If you use simple (which is a steady solver) you get a steady flow sometime. This requires that the physical reality of this Re is steady. If you try simple at high unsteady flows the solver may crash. In a pipe flow you get eddies which evolves form the boundary an then move in the free stream. This is unsteady by nature. If you use a correct (unsteady) solver like piso or pimple you don't get a steady solution, which is physical correct. I recommend to follow the course of a suitable flow variable and wait until it's frequency comes more or less to a steady value. You may try the pressure at the outlet for this or forces at the wall.
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
April 27, 2017, 02:07 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
vidyadhar
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 10 |
Thank you Pilz for the reply.
I am using a transient solver. If the flow becomes unsteady at higher Re, you are asking me to monitor the frequency of a flow variable. But, in my case, the pressure at outlet is equal to ambient and fixed. Can I try to plot the frequency of the flow velocity. I do not know how to plot the forces at the wall. Thank you. |
|
April 27, 2017, 05:02 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Uwe Pilz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 744
Rep Power: 15 |
> I do not know how to plot the forces at the wall.
Put in system/controlDict Code:
functions { forces { type forceCoeffs; functionObjectLibs ( "libforces.so" ); outputControl timeStep; outputInterval 1; patches ( nameOfMyWall ); pName p; UName U; rhoName rhoInf; log true; rhoInf 1; liftDir (0 1 0); dragDir (1 0 0); CofR (-0.5 0 0); pitchAxis (0 1 0); magUInf 1; lRef 1; Aref 1; } }
__________________
Uwe Pilz -- Die der Hauptbewegung überlagerte Schwankungsbewegung ist in ihren Einzelheiten so hoffnungslos kompliziert, daß ihre theoretische Berechnung aussichtslos erscheint. (Hermann Schlichting, 1950) |
|
|
|