|
[Sponsors] |
February 28, 2017, 07:12 |
Which lagrangian method is best? (for me)
|
#1 |
New Member
Adam Katz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi Foamers!
I am trying to simulate a microfluidics setup we are investigating. The setup is composed of a microscopic channel running a dilute solution of cells of known size. My assumptions are: 1) incompressible 2) laminar 3) one-way coupling I came up with the following solvers: icoUncoupledKinematicParcelFoam (simple)ReactingParcelFoam Could you please explain the difference between the two? is there is another solver which is better? Another question: I solved my flow (without particles) using simpleFoam, can I take the results and use them as data for the lagrangian solver? Thanks, Adam |
|
February 28, 2017, 16:55 |
|
#2 |
Member
Declan
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Ireland
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi Adam,
icoUncoupledKinematicParcelFoam sounds fine if you just have one type of particle that doesn't react. You can take the results from simpleFoam and use the mapFields utility to use the steady state results as your initial condition in the lagrangian simulation. Hope this helps! Declan |
|
March 1, 2017, 07:05 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Adam Katz
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 9 |
Thanks Declan!
mapFields worked. Now I'm stuck with injecting the particles. (I posted a new thread) |
|
Tags |
particle tracking, reactingparcelfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Requesting suggestions for appropriate Lagrangian method | suyesh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 1, 2016 06:27 |
Solution method | michimichi88 | Fluent Multiphase | 0 | May 13, 2015 12:35 |
Lattice Boltzmann method vs Finite Element Method and Finite Volume Method | solemnpriest | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 12, 2013 12:00 |
Info on method of lines approach | charlie ryan | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 9, 2007 12:06 |
tidal flow simulation using finite volume method | Jason Qiu | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 20, 2002 03:34 |