|
[Sponsors] |
January 18, 2017, 05:54 |
Max Courant Number exploded
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi all,
I am trying a simulation of venturi meter type geometry. For this, i am using pimpleFoam, after few time step there is tremendous increase of max courant Number and then program get stop. For futher reference i am attaching geometry, error, blockMeshDict and ControlDict files. Any suggestion is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance |
|
January 18, 2017, 13:12 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi,
It seems that your mesh isn't good enough : 85 max non-orthogonality is quite high. Try to improve your mesh, and it should be better. Regards, Sati |
|
January 18, 2017, 13:56 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Oskar
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Poland
Posts: 184
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello.
As sati said, You have high non-orthogonality in Your mesh. Also... Is Your case really 54m^3? Or maybe You forgot to transform units from [mm] to [m]? |
|
January 20, 2017, 02:36 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks sati and sheaker for you response.
As i change the solver from pimpleFoam to icoFoam, simulation run well with this mesh. For this, i tried different schemes in fvSchemes file in icoFoam. I am attaching file for which my simulation going well. Moreover, yes Sheaker, i forget to transform my geometry into mm. Again my question, is non-orthogonality affect my simulation in pimpleFoam. How to improve the non-orthogonality? Is different blocking strategy will improve the non-orthogonality? Thanks |
|
January 20, 2017, 04:19 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 11 |
You can indeed improve your mesh with a different blocking.
You are using a single block to mesh a cylinder. This is not optimal : the cells situated at the corner of your block are very distorted. To improve that, you can use a blocking similar to the one used in the following picture : |
|
January 20, 2017, 05:20 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 13 |
thank you sati!
I got your point. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] Can't Shake Erros: patch type 'patch' not constraint type 'empty' | BrendaEM | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 12 | April 3, 2022 19:32 |
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 37 | July 20, 2020 06:38 |
Problem of simulating of small droplet with radius of 2mm | liguifan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | June 3, 2014 03:53 |
dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF???? | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | August 26, 2013 08:47 |
same geometry,structured and unstructured mesh,different behaviour. | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | January 2, 2013 23:40 |