|
[Sponsors] |
pimpleFoam Vs pimpleDyMFoam -- Different Results |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 16, 2016, 12:14 |
pimpleFoam Vs pimpleDyMFoam -- Different Results
|
#1 |
New Member
Aditya
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Munich Germany
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 13 |
I am trying to simulate a cylinder in flow problem (2D).
Case 1 : Code:
Flow around a cylinder Turbulence Model : LES (all default values) Wall Function : nutUSpaldingWallFunction (for nuSgs) solver : pimpleFoam Code:
All physics same as Case 1. No Displacement on the mesh solver : pimpleDyMFoam Code:
OpenFOAM version 2.2.1 Now when I plot the forces(Lift and Drag) on the cylinder they are completely different. Here I am posting the plots. I am totally confused. I am doing this because I want to use the pimpleDyMFoam for FSI simulations (because of mesh motion possibility). So I want to make sure that pimpleDyMFoam, with mesh motion set to 0 on relevant patches, gives same result as pimpleFoam . But apparently this is not the case. Any hints to as what is happening is really helpful. |
|
April 22, 2017, 03:05 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Will
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi Aditya,
Did you ever solve this problem? In my case, my pimpleFoam results converges smoothly while pimpleDyMFoam with no mesh motion diverged after 10-20 iterations. |
|
Tags |
cfd - post, pimpledymfoam dynamic, pimplefoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OpenFOAM - Validation of Results | Ahmed | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | May 13, 2018 19:28 |
lid driven cavity varying results | yasmil | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | October 6, 2016 22:42 |
CFD results not close to experimental results | cider | STAR-CCM+ | 0 | July 8, 2013 08:53 |
Creating a tool to interpolate results | Luis Batista | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | April 11, 2013 09:15 |
CFX cylinder or sphere benchmark results | Mel | CFX | 1 | August 8, 2005 19:47 |