CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

twoPhaseEulerFoam only let continous phase leave the domain

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 9, 2016, 12:47
Default twoPhaseEulerFoam only let continous phase leave the domain
  #1
Senior Member
 
Tom Fahner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Breda, Netherlands
Posts: 647
Rep Power: 32
tomf will become famous soon enoughtomf will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to tomf Send a message via Skype™ to tomf
Hi all,

At the moment I am working on a packed bed case where a liquid is flowing through a packed bed. The situation is such that there is an inlet at the top where the liquid enters, a region with only liquid, than the packed bed which is located above the outlet. The real case is a bit more complicated geometrically, but basically it is the same. I want to have that the liquid can freely exit the domain, but that the particles of the packed bed remain inside the domain.

So a picture to show the simplified 2D situation (start.png), laminar flow of water should be from top to bottom, but after 2 minutes the situation is as shown in end.png. The case is using a uniform blockMesh mesh, with aspect ratio of 1 throughout.

I had looked around on the forum for degassing boundary conditions or similar set-ups and people have used a slip boundary condition for the particles with a zeroGradient or inletOutlet boundary condition for the water. Following the fluidised bed tutorial I used a prghpressure (also tried fixedValue) boundary condition for p_rgh on the outlet.

I have also attached the simplified case (for OpenFOAM version 4.x, probably works for 3.0.x with minor modifications). Right now it is configured to run on 10 processors, if you want to have a look, please modify the decomposeParDict and the runscript.sh according to your system.

I have tried to run the case with OpenFOAM v3.0.x, v4.x, openFoam-plus and foamExtend-3.2, which all gave similar results.

If anyone can help, I would much appreciate this.
Regards,
Tom
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Start.jpg (25.8 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg End.jpg (24.7 KB, 30 views)
Attached Files
File Type: gz Outlet_Case.tar.gz (6.5 KB, 5 views)

Last edited by tomf; August 9, 2016 at 12:54. Reason: clarification on simplified case version
tomf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2016, 10:10
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Tom Fahner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Breda, Netherlands
Posts: 647
Rep Power: 32
tomf will become famous soon enoughtomf will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to tomf Send a message via Skype™ to tomf
Small update:

Tried to run the same case using MFIX, which also gave similar results, however I have no experience with MFIX, so I am a bit unsure about the setup for it. I tried to match it as much as possible with the OpenFOAM cases.

Some other things I tried: use a porous model for the particle phase only, use explicitSetValue constraints for the particle phase, change the order of the phase definitions, but nothing seems to have a significant effect on the outcome.

Then I treid to give the particle phase a small upwards velocity from the outlet, this quite quickly (couple of tens of timesteps) causes a divergence in the solver after the alpha equation goes out of bounds.

Maybe I am trying something that is not possible? If you think so as well, please let me know.

Best regards,
Tom
tomf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2016, 09:49
Default Added a sketch of the problem with applied boundary conditions
  #3
Senior Member
 
Tom Fahner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Breda, Netherlands
Posts: 647
Rep Power: 32
tomf will become famous soon enoughtomf will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to tomf Send a message via Skype™ to tomf
Please find attached a sketch of the problem with the applied boundary conditions.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Sketch2.jpg (126.1 KB, 77 views)
tomf is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UDF to constrain one of the phase to stay in the domain Koromajor Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 23 April 15, 2020 20:21
UDF for modifying density of mixture phase during the calculating process sola86 Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 2 May 28, 2019 10:24
Setting rotating frame of referece. RPFigueiredo CFX 3 October 28, 2014 05:59
stratified horizontal two phase flow usinfg twoPhaseEulerFoam karthik1414 OpenFOAM 0 April 12, 2011 10:57
Particles leave my domain (Discrete Particle Model) diffo FLUENT 0 March 19, 2009 12:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:57.