|
[Sponsors] |
combustion with chemistrySolver "ode" or "EulerImplicit"? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 26, 2016, 02:39 |
combustion with chemistrySolver "ode" or "EulerImplicit"?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Dear combustion specialists,
my question is how to choose efficient settings for the chemistrySolver in combustionProperties depending on the kind of combustion simulation. In $FOAM_TUTORIALS/combustion, there are some cases using "EulerImplicit" and other cases using "ode" for the chemistrySolver. Can you give some guidance how to decide which of the two is appropriate? Does it depend on the flow field? On the size of the reactions database? On the temperature range? Similarly useful could be a mathematical explanation, why the one or the other is preferred. EulerImplicit is an integration method that is also able to solve stiff problems although it is less accurate than for example ode/SIBS for the same step size. I wonder if there is an underlying property of the problem that tells which of the chemistry solvers is likely to be more efficient, or do I have to use trial and error? Thank you Cristopher |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Modelling Combustion in Porous Zone | tanjinjack | FLUENT | 2 | September 26, 2016 05:10 |
Partially Premixed Combustion - Direct Fired Boiler | oknus | FLUENT | 0 | April 10, 2012 11:52 |
hydrocarbon gases + Boron particle combustion | nileshjrane | OpenFOAM | 1 | December 13, 2010 07:20 |
Hydrogen Air combustion in a combustion chamber | popi | CFX | 7 | July 11, 2007 19:40 |
Need Similar Combustion Tutorial as my model | Arnab | Siemens | 0 | May 24, 2005 19:23 |