CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

airfoil 2D: how to validate results?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 8, 2016, 12:29
Default
  #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10
giammy92 is on a distinguished road
but my previous are unbelieveble! I have changed my mixing leght, and increasing it until 100, i have achieved the same results for Cl!! What means this?
giammy92 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2016, 13:02
Default
  #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10
giammy92 is on a distinguished road
My current dat are:

K

dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];

internalField uniform 0.0025847;

boundaryField
{
TRAILING_EDGE
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 1e-12;
}
SUCTION_SIDE
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 1e-12;
}
FAR_FIELD
{
type turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet;
intensity 0.001;
value uniform 0.0025847;
}
PRESSURE_SIDE
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 1e-12;
}
frontAndBackPlanes
{
type empty;
}
}

NUT

dimensions [0 2 -1 0 0 0 0];

internalField uniform 0;

boundaryField
{
TRAILING_EDGE
{
type calculated;
value uniform 0;
}
SUCTION_SIDE
{
type calculated;
value uniform 0;
}
FAR_FIELD
{
type calculated;
value uniform 0;
}
PRESSURE_SIDE
{
type calculated;
value uniform 0;
}
frontAndBackPlanes
{
type empty;
}
}

OMEGA

dimensions [0 0 -1 0 0 0 0];

internalField uniform 1769.45;

boundaryField
{
TRAILING_EDGE
{
type omegaWallFunction;
value uniform 1769.45;
}
SUCTION_SIDE
{
type omegaWallFunction;
value uniform 1769.45;
}
FAR_FIELD
{
type turbulentMixingLengthFrequencyInlet;
mixingLength 0.4;
value uniform 1769.45;
}
PRESSURE_SIDE
{
type omegaWallFunction;
value uniform 1769.45;
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
}

P

dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];

internalField uniform 0;

boundaryField
{
TRAILING_EDGE
{
type zeroGradient;
}
SUCTION_SIDE
{
type zeroGradient;
}
FAR_FIELD
{
type freestreamPressure;
}
PRESSURE_SIDE
{
type zeroGradient;
}
frontAndBackPlanes
{
type empty;
}
}

U

imensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];

internalField uniform (40.447 9.338 0); // (41.511*cos13 41.511*sin13)

boundaryField
{
TRAILING_EDGE
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
SUCTION_SIDE
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
FAR_FIELD
{
type freestream;
freestreamValue uniform (40.447 9.338 0);
}
PRESSURE_SIDE
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}
frontAndBackPlanes
{
type empty;
}
}
giammy92 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2016, 13:04
Default
  #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10
giammy92 is on a distinguished road
and my now i'm trying with this fvschemes and fvsolution:

ddtSchemes
{
default steadyState;
}

gradSchemes
{
default Gauss linear;
grad(U) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
}

divSchemes
{
default none;
div(phi,U) bounded Gauss linear;
div(phi,k) bounded Gauss limitedLinear 1;
div(phi,omega) bounded Gauss limitedLinear 1;
div((nuEff*dev(T(grad(U))))) Gauss linear;
}

laplacianSchemes
{
default Gauss linear corrected;
}

interpolationSchemes
{
default linear;
}

snGradSchemes
{
default corrected;
}

fluxRequired
{
default no;
p;
}



solvers
{
p
{
solver GAMG;
tolerance 1e-7;
relTol 0.01;
smoother GaussSeidel;
nPreSweeps 0;
nPostSweeps 2;
cacheAgglomeration on;
nCellsInCoarsestLevel 10;
agglomerator faceAreaPair;
mergeLevels 1;
}

U
{
solver smoothSolver;
smoother GaussSeidel;
nSweeps 1;
tolerance 1e-08;
relTol 0.1;
}

k
{
solver smoothSolver;
smoother GaussSeidel;
tolerance 1e-8;
relTol 0.1;
nSweeps 1;
}

omega
{
solver smoothSolver;
smoother GaussSeidel;
tolerance 1e-8;
relTol 0.1;
nSweeps 1;
}

}

SIMPLE
{
nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 0;
pRefCell 0;
pRefValue 0;

residualControl
{
p 1e-5;
U 1e-5;
k 1e-5;
omega 1e-5;
}
}

potentialFlow
{
nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 10;
}

relaxationFactors
{
fields
{
p 0.3;
}
equations
{
U 0.4;
k 0.4;
omega 0.4;
}
}

cache
{
grad(U);
}
giammy92 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2016, 08:53
Exclamation
  #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10
giammy92 is on a distinguished road
Do you think that for omega's bc at wall i have to use Menter's recommended wall BC, i. e. omegawall=60*nu/(beta*y^2), with nu=kinematic viscosity at the wall, beta=0.075 and y=normal distance between the first fluid node and the nearest wall ? But how i can calculate y and nu at wall? Is the same of nu calculated with mu/rho?
Or if i want use omegawallfunction i have before implement the code with:
omega[faceCellI] = omegaLog;

i refer to this discussion http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...estigated.html
giammy92 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ffd_control_point_2d feiyi SU2 4 September 30, 2019 13:42
CFD validation on Eppler 473 airfoil and getting incorrect results Willemsj FLUENT 4 April 5, 2015 17:59
Unphysical Results of Low-Re Airfoil Simulations ericthefatguy SU2 2 February 2, 2015 06:07
Airfoil moving inside a fluid - Results discussion GM_XIII STAR-CCM+ 6 July 18, 2013 23:29
[FloWorks] Request advice for an airfoil calculation problem Bogey Jammer Main CFD Forum 0 September 29, 2009 18:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:02.