|
[Sponsors] |
April 8, 2016, 12:29 |
|
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10 |
but my previous are unbelieveble! I have changed my mixing leght, and increasing it until 100, i have achieved the same results for Cl!! What means this?
|
|
April 8, 2016, 13:02 |
|
#22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10 |
My current dat are:
K dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0.0025847; boundaryField { TRAILING_EDGE { type fixedValue; value uniform 1e-12; } SUCTION_SIDE { type fixedValue; value uniform 1e-12; } FAR_FIELD { type turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet; intensity 0.001; value uniform 0.0025847; } PRESSURE_SIDE { type fixedValue; value uniform 1e-12; } frontAndBackPlanes { type empty; } } NUT dimensions [0 2 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0; boundaryField { TRAILING_EDGE { type calculated; value uniform 0; } SUCTION_SIDE { type calculated; value uniform 0; } FAR_FIELD { type calculated; value uniform 0; } PRESSURE_SIDE { type calculated; value uniform 0; } frontAndBackPlanes { type empty; } } OMEGA dimensions [0 0 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 1769.45; boundaryField { TRAILING_EDGE { type omegaWallFunction; value uniform 1769.45; } SUCTION_SIDE { type omegaWallFunction; value uniform 1769.45; } FAR_FIELD { type turbulentMixingLengthFrequencyInlet; mixingLength 0.4; value uniform 1769.45; } PRESSURE_SIDE { type omegaWallFunction; value uniform 1769.45; } frontAndBack { type empty; } } P dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0; boundaryField { TRAILING_EDGE { type zeroGradient; } SUCTION_SIDE { type zeroGradient; } FAR_FIELD { type freestreamPressure; } PRESSURE_SIDE { type zeroGradient; } frontAndBackPlanes { type empty; } } U imensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (40.447 9.338 0); // (41.511*cos13 41.511*sin13) boundaryField { TRAILING_EDGE { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } SUCTION_SIDE { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } FAR_FIELD { type freestream; freestreamValue uniform (40.447 9.338 0); } PRESSURE_SIDE { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } frontAndBackPlanes { type empty; } } |
|
April 8, 2016, 13:04 |
|
#23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10 |
and my now i'm trying with this fvschemes and fvsolution:
ddtSchemes { default steadyState; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; grad(U) cellLimited Gauss linear 1; } divSchemes { default none; div(phi,U) bounded Gauss linear; div(phi,k) bounded Gauss limitedLinear 1; div(phi,omega) bounded Gauss limitedLinear 1; div((nuEff*dev(T(grad(U))))) Gauss linear; } laplacianSchemes { default Gauss linear corrected; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; } snGradSchemes { default corrected; } fluxRequired { default no; p; } solvers { p { solver GAMG; tolerance 1e-7; relTol 0.01; smoother GaussSeidel; nPreSweeps 0; nPostSweeps 2; cacheAgglomeration on; nCellsInCoarsestLevel 10; agglomerator faceAreaPair; mergeLevels 1; } U { solver smoothSolver; smoother GaussSeidel; nSweeps 1; tolerance 1e-08; relTol 0.1; } k { solver smoothSolver; smoother GaussSeidel; tolerance 1e-8; relTol 0.1; nSweeps 1; } omega { solver smoothSolver; smoother GaussSeidel; tolerance 1e-8; relTol 0.1; nSweeps 1; } } SIMPLE { nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 0; pRefCell 0; pRefValue 0; residualControl { p 1e-5; U 1e-5; k 1e-5; omega 1e-5; } } potentialFlow { nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 10; } relaxationFactors { fields { p 0.3; } equations { U 0.4; k 0.4; omega 0.4; } } cache { grad(U); } |
|
April 11, 2016, 08:53 |
|
#24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10 |
Do you think that for omega's bc at wall i have to use Menter's recommended wall BC, i. e. omegawall=60*nu/(beta*y^2), with nu=kinematic viscosity at the wall, beta=0.075 and y=normal distance between the first fluid node and the nearest wall ? But how i can calculate y and nu at wall? Is the same of nu calculated with mu/rho?
Or if i want use omegawallfunction i have before implement the code with: omega[faceCellI] = omegaLog; i refer to this discussion http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...estigated.html |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ffd_control_point_2d | feiyi | SU2 | 4 | September 30, 2019 13:42 |
CFD validation on Eppler 473 airfoil and getting incorrect results | Willemsj | FLUENT | 4 | April 5, 2015 17:59 |
Unphysical Results of Low-Re Airfoil Simulations | ericthefatguy | SU2 | 2 | February 2, 2015 06:07 |
Airfoil moving inside a fluid - Results discussion | GM_XIII | STAR-CCM+ | 6 | July 18, 2013 23:29 |
[FloWorks] Request advice for an airfoil calculation problem | Bogey Jammer | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 29, 2009 18:06 |