|
[Sponsors] |
Odd artefact at an impermeable-wall boundary in a moving-mesh case (pimpleDyMFoam) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 4, 2016, 12:33 |
Odd artefact at an impermeable-wall boundary in a moving-mesh case (pimpleDyMFoam)
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi everyone,
I find an odd artefact in my simulations and I wonder if anyone has an idea what the reason for this might be: I simulate incompressible flow in a closed 2D domain (see thumbnail below, all boundaries are impermeable walls with non-slip condition, front and back are 'empty'). The round object at the bottom of the box deforms in time, setting the surrounding fluid in motion. The deformation is such that the volume of the domain is always conserved. I essentially use the pimpleDyMFoam solver, which I modified only to implement the boundary deformation at the object (I move individual nodes of the boundary by precomputed values). The simulation runs without any apparent problems, but in the solution I find a region next to the object where fluid would appear to flow in and out through the boundary, in contradiction to the imposed boundary condition (see the attached artefact.pdf with a picture of this). The effect is confined to a single cell of the boundary (which otherwise seems no different than any other such cell) and a small adjacent region in the interior of the domain. I created the mesh in SALOME - checkMesh complained about unused points (for which I'm not sure why they are there), but the simulation ran anyway - so is it simply this mesh problem that comes to the surface here? Here is the checkMesh log: Code:
Create time Create polyMesh for time = 0 Time = 0 Mesh stats points: 60120 internal points: 20040 faces: 136184 internal faces: 57391 cells: 38715 faces per cell: 5 boundary patches: 5 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 0 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 0 prisms: 38715 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 0 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. ***Unused points found in the mesh, number unused by faces: 20040 number unused by cells: 20040 <<Writing 20040 unused points to set unusedPoints Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology Wall 1121 2244 ok (non-closed singly connected) reticularLamina 57 116 ok (non-closed singly connected) HCedge 185 372 ok (non-closed singly connected) back 38715 20040 ok (non-closed singly connected) front 38715 20040 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-8e-05 -2.27273e-05 0) (0.0002 0.00018 1e-05) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 0) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 0) All edges aligned with or perpendicular to non-empty directions. Boundary openness (4.91637e-18 -9.05108e-18 -1.03072e-14) OK. Max cell openness = 2.50802e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 2.03434 OK. Minimum face area = 1.34262e-13. Maximum face area = 3.54092e-11. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 1.34262e-18. Max volume = 4.95254e-17. Total volume = 5.00625e-13. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 19.8124 average: 4.71872 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 3.42953 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Failed 1 mesh checks. If anyone has seen something like this or has a guess where it comes from (I have the feeling it must be some stupid rookie mistake on my part), any comment is highly appreciated! Let me know if you need any further information. Regards and thanks in advance, Nikolac |
|
Tags |
boundary condtions, moving boundary, pimpledymfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Waterwheel shaped turbine inside a pipe simulation problem | mshahed91 | CFX | 3 | January 10, 2015 12:19 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 07:28 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |
Deal with wall boundary with moving mesh by FVM? | aiya | Main CFD Forum | 6 | May 10, 2007 12:33 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |