Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Combustion models defined without a transport package

Updated Threads

Reply

Search this Thread

December 27, 2015, 22:31	Combustion models defined without a transport package	#1
t.oliveira Senior Member Thomas Oliveira Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 114 Rep Power: 12	Some combustion models (diffusion, FSD, infinitelyFastChemistry) require the definition of a transport package (constTransport, sutherlandTransport) while others (noCombustion, laminar, PaSR) don't. Why is it like that? In which aspect the second group of combustion models differs from the first one, so to not need the definition of a transport package?

Reply

Tags

combustion model

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Combustion Chamber Species Transport	Catthan	FLUENT	2	April 27, 2021 04:39
user defined scalar vs species transport	gvj_mech	FLUENT	0	March 27, 2014 15:33
using METIS functions in fortran	dokeun	Main CFD Forum	7	January 29, 2013 05:06
OpenFoam 1.6-ext - RPM build errors	preibie	OpenFOAM	12	September 8, 2011 04:12
Errors running allwmake in OpenFOAM141dev with WM_COMPILE_OPTION%3ddebug	unoder	OpenFOAM Installation	11	January 30, 2008 21:30

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:49.