|
[Sponsors] |
September 30, 2015, 08:46 |
PimpleFoam converted to BuoyantPimpleFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Colleagues,
I am relatively new to using OpenFoam so I thought I would take a staged approach to my second in-depth simulation. I am trying to simulate warm water entering a tank at the bottom and exiting at the top. The velocity and temperature are fixed at the inlet and the pressure is fixed at the outlet. I simulated this successfully without the energy equation using pimpleFoam. However, when I convert my BCs, controlDict, fvSchemes, and fvSolution files to work with BuoyantPimpleFoam my simulation returns results that do not make sense. When I simulated the problem with pimpleFoam my courant number stayed below 0.5 and my velocity streamlines showed a smooth path from the inlet to the outlet. When I simulated using BuoyantPimpleFoam the courant number quickly exceeds 0.5 and the each grid point that is not near the inlet or outlet has a different velocity vector, in fact, the velocity seems randomized. Can anyone help me understand my different results? I can post more details if needed. |
|
Tags |
buoyantpimplefoam, heat transfer, pimplefoam, turbulence |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fan in buoyantPimpleFoam | tommo97 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | January 12, 2016 17:23 |
buoyantPimpleFoam Convergence Issues | joel.lehikoinen | OpenFOAM | 1 | December 5, 2013 15:58 |
pimpleFoam: turbulence->correct(); is not executed when using residualControl | hfs | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 29, 2013 09:35 |
Understanding pimpleFoam convergence criterion | Nucleophobe | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | March 13, 2013 19:46 |
Differences simpleFoam vs. pimpleFoam / RASModel.H vs turbulenceModel.H | uli | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 7 | January 26, 2013 16:01 |