|
[Sponsors] |
Which would be the most suitable standard solver in ejector problem? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 7, 2015, 14:26 |
Which would be the most suitable standard solver in ejector problem?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello,
I am trying to solve an ejector (the suction of a low pressure fluid in a secondary nozzle by a high pressure fluid accelerated in a primary convergent-divergent nozzle) with gas in both of the nozzles. The problem is expected to be super-sonic due to the use of the convergent-divergent nozzle. The fluid is the same in both of the nozzles and it is considered compressible. Which could be the best standard solver for this case? I have though in doing a density-based approach so it could be used rhoCentralFoam as standard solver but I do not know how important is the Mach number in the selection of the solver and sonicFoam should be used. The point is that sonicFoam is transient and I want to run steady simulation. I do not know if the rhoSimpleFoam could be a suitable solver also for my case. Any suggestion? Regards, |
|
October 25, 2019, 11:58 |
Answer
|
#2 |
New Member
pranav
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Did you find out what solver was best suited for ejectors? If so, what was it?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Creating New Solver: For particle-laden compressible jets | sankarv | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | December 3, 2014 20:41 |
Working directory via command line | Luiz | CFX | 4 | March 6, 2011 21:02 |
need for an unsteady implicit solver suitable for large timestep | dinonettis | OpenFOAM | 2 | May 26, 2010 07:57 |
Creating New Solver: For particle-laden compressible jets | sankarv | OpenFOAM | 0 | April 4, 2010 19:06 |
Error during Solver | cfd guy | CFX | 4 | May 8, 2001 07:04 |