|
[Sponsors] |
T-Junction using rhoPimpleFoam (Simulation blows and weird result) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 23, 2015, 00:29 |
T-Junction using rhoPimpleFoam (Simulation blows and weird result)
|
#1 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi All,
I am trying to simulation T-Junction using rhoPimpleFoam (One Inlet, two Outlet). Mass Flow BC at both inlets (thats my requirement). Simulation blows after some time and the results looks weird. Velocity goes to 2750 m/s. What might the problem. I have attached the BC and problem setup, also vector plot. Error Msg -> FOAM FATAL ERROR: Maximum number of iterations exceeded From function thermo<Thermo, Type>::T(scalar f, scalar T0, scalar (thermo<Thermo, Type>::*F)(const scalar) const, scalar (thermo<Thermo, Type>::*dFdT)(const scalar) const, scalar (thermo<Thermo, Type>::*limit)(const scalar) const) const in file /home/umagopinath/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-2.3.0/src/thermophysicalModels/specie/lnInclude/thermoI.H at line 76. FOAM aborting Thanks KGN |
|
July 23, 2015, 02:15 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 17 |
I simulated the same case using "rhoCentralFoam" and the results converges. Attached Vector plot.
But for the same Co number the time step is significantly less in "rhoCentralFoam". Co number 0.55 rhoCentralFoam = 3.2e-7 rhoPimpleFoam = 2.2e-06 Why such a difference? But with rhoPimpleFoam the simulation blows after some time and also the results are weird. I guess the boundary condition is creating the problem with "rhoPimpleFoam" solver. I know only mass inflow and mass outflow of the system plus total temperature at inlet. Thanks KGN Last edited by mecbe2002; July 23, 2015 at 04:06. |
|
July 23, 2015, 06:50 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Wouter van der Meer
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Elahuizen, Netherlands
Posts: 203
Rep Power: 18 |
hello mecbe2002,
I am not experienced with rhoPimpleFoam or rhoPisoFoam but looking at your system I think it is over dimensioned. You can only set one Inlet and one outlet mass flow so the system can calculate the second outlet mass flow based on a fixed outlet pressure. Best regards Wouter |
|
July 23, 2015, 07:29 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
KGN
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi wouter,
Thank for the reply. Yes i too thinks so. But the problem is that, I know only mass flow rate/mass flux at inlet and mass flow rate at outlet. For pressure based solver, one pressure and one velocity has to specified. Is there is way to solve this problem? Thanks KGN |
|
July 23, 2015, 16:26 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Wouter van der Meer
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Elahuizen, Netherlands
Posts: 203
Rep Power: 18 |
hello mecbe2002,
The easiest way I can think of is guessing a pressure and calculating with this to steady state and checking this with what you want and try another pressure and calculating again and so iterating till you got your solution. hope this helps Wouter |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Blocking strategy for sharp angle junction (Pipe) | Daniel_Khazaei | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | February 19, 2015 12:31 |
Pressure stair-step behaviour using rhopimplefoam | joegi.geo | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | December 12, 2014 13:10 |
OpenMP in Junction Box Routine | Hannes_Kiel | CFX | 10 | September 21, 2010 14:51 |
Junction Box | Anil | CFX | 2 | June 27, 2006 11:18 |
junction box routine | Lexi | CFX | 2 | January 21, 2004 05:55 |