|
[Sponsors] |
June 30, 2015, 23:12 |
What is wrong in this new Solver
|
#1 |
New Member
anas
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 11 |
Dear interested,
I have added the Dynamic Mesh feature to the compressibleMultiphaseInterDyMFoam solver (OF-2.3.1). It is correctly compiled. However when I run a test case the results show that the fluid cells in the moving zone are not moving!. I have checked the case setup with moveDynamicMesh and everything was well. Any idea is welcome. The new solver is attached. Many thanks in advance |
|
November 12, 2015, 08:24 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Matthias Neben
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Cottbus (Germany)
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello anas,
have you solved the problem or got an idea of the solving it? Matthias |
|
March 30, 2018, 07:52 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi,
I compared your solver with compressibleMultiphaseInterFoam for a dam4break case. You are not getting any liquid movement because your time step gets much smaller when you are refining compared to when you are not. Like 4 orders of magnitude. And it keeps decreasing with time. The reason I think this happens is because you are getting this warning when you do the checkMesh. "***Total number of faces on empty patches is not divisible by the number of cells in the mesh. Hence this mesh is not 1D or 2D." This mesh error might be the thing messing this up, because in general time step should decrease only by a factor of 2 if you are refining for 1 level. Have you made any progress? Best, |
|
May 25, 2018, 06:05 |
|
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi,
if anybody is still interested I made a compressibleMultiphaseInterDyMFoam solver (linux 4.0 version) The solver works nicely for me on a dambreak tutorial. CAUTION: this was done by comparing multpaseInterFoam with multiphaseInterDyMFoam and adding the same things for the compressible version. Those are incompressible solvers and it might be that in compressible flow some additional things need to be added. Also the solver has not yet been tested, so use at your own risk. Cheers |
|
Tags |
dynamic mesh, multiphase, new solver |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EMMS drag model UDF | NAD | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 26 | November 19, 2017 08:49 |
Quarter Burner mesh with periosic condition | SamCanuck | FLUENT | 2 | August 31, 2011 12:34 |
Working directory via command line | Luiz | CFX | 4 | March 6, 2011 21:02 |
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? | bearcat | CFX | 6 | April 28, 2008 15:08 |
What is wrong with turbo solver | waynezw0618 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | December 11, 2007 08:12 |