CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Cavity tutorial case

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 11, 2015, 05:26
Default Cavity tutorial case
  #1
New Member
 
Gopal Shinde
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 17
shinde.gopal is on a distinguished road
Hi Foamers,

I have a question related to the cavity problem (tutorial case).
In the cavity tutorial case, domain size is 1 x 1 x 0.1 with 20 x 20 x 1 as the cell count in the blockMesh dict file.
I have increased the domain size to 100 x 100 x 0.1 with 2000 x 2000 x 1 as the cell count in the blockMesh dict file.
The controlDict, fvSchemes, fvSolution files are the same in both cases.
The tutuorial case gets over in a jiffy and the new cavity case (with increased domain and cells) takes a long time almost an hour to reach 100 itrs (t = 0.5 sec with dt = 0.005).

In the new case, iterations of orthogonal correctors for p are in the range 1000 and in the original case it is 1 or 2.
Please guide / help me in understanding why this is happening ?

Looking forward for your expert help and tips.

Gopal.

Last edited by shinde.gopal; June 11, 2015 at 05:52. Reason: typo mistake in the essential data
shinde.gopal is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 11, 2015, 06:13
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Al_th
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 11
al_th is on a distinguished road
Hello,

In the original tutorial you solve a system with 400 cells.
In your modified case, you solve a system with 4 000 000 cells.

Remember that when you compute your solution, you need to compute it for each and every cell of your domain, and increasing drastically the number of cells will of course drastically increase the time you need.

Edit : in the cavity case there is no "non-orthogonal" corrector set up. Did you mean iterations for the pressure solutions ?
al_th is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 12, 2015, 02:59
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Gopal Shinde
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 17
shinde.gopal is on a distinguished road
Dear Al_th,

Yes I meant the large number of iterations for pressure solutions.
How they are so large in number ?

Gopal.
shinde.gopal is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 12, 2015, 06:50
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Al_th
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 11
al_th is on a distinguished road
Dear Gopal,

I am not an expert of CFD at all but I can try and do some wild guess of what is happening.

I did run two or three iterations of your case (cavity with increased number of cells) and apparently the final residual of the pressure is far higher than what is prescribed in the controlDictFile.

The domain might be too large, thus it may be difficult for the solver to reach a residual low enough.

Maybe you could try to put a higher residual threshold, but I'm not sure how it will affect the accuracy of the results.

Last edited by al_th; June 12, 2015 at 09:44.
al_th is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
blockmesh, cavity, dense grid, icofoam, orthogonality


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HronTurekFsi tutorial case using icoFsiElasticNonLinULSolidFoam MarcelK OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 February 25, 2019 03:25
Is Playstation 3 cluster suitable for CFD work hsieh OpenFOAM 9 August 16, 2015 15:53
[ImmersedBoundary] foam-extend 3.1, Immersed boundary cavity flow case modification problems Anamitra OpenFOAM Community Contributions 0 March 18, 2015 09:50
[OpenFOAM] "Data Range Too Small To Render" Cavity Tutorial H0T_S0UP ParaView 1 January 31, 2015 19:31
[OpenFOAM] Trouble running paraFoam in cavity tutorial sweisenb ParaView 2 October 10, 2014 16:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:08.