|
[Sponsors] |
April 22, 2015, 06:59 |
Optically Thin Assumption
|
#1 |
Member
Mehtab
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi,
I want to use optically thin assumption for modelling radiation in my case. What is exactly meant by optically thin assumption? As far, I know it adds radiative source term to the energy equation. Please add more info. Is there any tutorial in OpenFOAM using optical thin assumption for radiation modelling? What parameters should I define in my case setup to enable this assumption? any idea? Thanks Cummins Last edited by mehtab; April 23, 2015 at 14:42. |
|
April 23, 2015, 04:55 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 397
Rep Power: 19 |
Optically thin means that the product of a characteristic length and the absorption coefficient is low, typically l * kappa < 0.25. This means that the radiation passes through this length (mostly) undisturbed.
Suitable radiation models for this can be fvDOM and possibly viewFactors. P1 model on the other hand is valid only for optically thick cases. |
|
April 23, 2015, 07:22 |
|
#3 | |
Member
Mehtab
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Thanks for your response. I understand that fvDOM is suitable for this case. I have gone through one paper using a radiation model as describe here: http://www.sandia.gov/TNF/radiation.html I am not sure whether this has been implemented in OpenFOAM or not. As per this model, RTE is not being solved and radiative source term is added to the energy equation. Can you please suggest me if this has been implemented in OpenFOAM if yes then how can I use this? Thanks Last edited by mehtab; April 23, 2015 at 08:37. |
||
April 23, 2015, 08:04 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 397
Rep Power: 19 |
They are using a very simple T^4 model, which simply assumes that the radiation is not reabsorbed inside the domain. This is not directly available, but you can easily add such a term to the energy equation of the solver you want to use and recompile it.
|
|
April 23, 2015, 09:18 |
|
#5 |
Member
Mehtab
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi Chris,
Thank you very much for your response. Actually I have started using fireFOAM soon and not good in programming. Is it possible for you to show me some path how can I add a source term in the energy equation? I am suing fireFoam solver. I think this is the part of code solving energy equation. volScalarField& he = thermo.he(); fvScalarMatrix EEqn ( fvm::ddt(rho, he) + mvConvection->fvmDiv(phi, he) + fvc::ddt(rho, K) + fvc::div(phi, K) + ( he.name() == "e" ? fvc::div ( fvc::absolute(phi/fvc::interpolate(rho), U), p, "div(phiv,p)" ) : -dpdt ) - fvm::laplacian(turbulence->alphaEff(), he) == combustion->Sh() + radiation->Sh(thermo) + parcels.Sh(he) + surfaceFilm.Sh() + fvOptions(rho, he) ); EEqn.relax(); fvOptions.constrain(EEqn); EEqn.solve(); fvOptions.correct(he); thermo.correct(); Thanks in advance. |
|
April 23, 2015, 10:04 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 397
Rep Power: 19 |
You're right, this is the correct part to add it. I think it would probably be something like this:
Code:
fvScalarMatrix EEqn ( fvm::ddt(rho, he) + mvConvection->fvmDiv(phi, he) + fvc::ddt(rho, K) + fvc::div(phi, K) + ( he.name() == "e" ? fvc::div ( fvc::absolute(phi/fvc::interpolate(rho), U), p, "div(phiv,p)" ) : -dpdt ) - fvm::laplacian(turbulence->alphaEff(), he) == combustion->Sh() + radiation->Sh(thermo) + parcels.Sh(he) + surfaceFilm.Sh() + fvOptions(rho, he) - 4 * thermo->p()*kappa*(pow(thermo->T(), 4) - pow(300, 4)) ); |
|
April 23, 2015, 11:07 |
|
#7 |
Member
Mehtab
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 11 |
Thanks Chriss,
I will try to do this. Just one more thing is there any tutorial or forum discussion aiming to add energy source term? Many Regards |
|
May 1, 2017, 12:37 |
Any progress
|
#8 |
Member
Sheikh Ahmed
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi Mehtab
Its a little late, but could you please tell me if you could successfully add the radiation model in the energy equation with optically thin approximation from the TNF workshop. It would be of great help if you share your thoughts with me. Thanks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ANSYS Meshing] Meshing thin surface in Ansys meshing | Scotty | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | August 15, 2014 12:39 |
Reversed flow error with thin film heater | MK | FLUENT | 1 | February 12, 2009 11:26 |
Thin surfaces within a body using DesignModeler? | Forrest | CFX | 7 | April 5, 2005 09:21 |
Meshing thin surfaces | Louwrens | CFX | 8 | August 18, 2003 18:49 |
Modelling thin surfaces in 5.6 | Louwrens | CFX | 0 | August 16, 2003 11:47 |