|
[Sponsors] |
January 20, 2015, 06:20 |
Freezer simulation
|
#1 |
New Member
Harshad Joshi
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
I am trying to simulate the performance of a freezer. The set point of the freezer is -30C. There are some products which will be delivered into the freezer at about 20C. There are a few heat flux boundaries also in the mix. the highest velocities seen will be around 7-8m/s. Which would be a better solver for this setup: 1) buoyantSimpleFoam (Perfect Gas) 2) buoyantSimpleFoam (incompressible Perfect Gas) or 2) buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam? Cheers, JHV |
|
January 21, 2015, 07:42 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Hi,
I would go for option 1 in this case. You will have temperature differences of 50 K, around 268 K, which means that your differences are approximately 20 % of the mean temperature. This seems to be a bit too much for the linearized Boussinesq type equation of state. Regards, Tom |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Waterbell Simulation | o.b.m | Fluent Multiphase | 1 | November 5, 2015 06:55 |
setting up a simulation with multiple interactions | phandy | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 6, 2014 04:16 |
mass flow rate issue in supersonic nozzle simulation | xkang | FLUENT | 0 | July 31, 2014 17:06 |
Simulation of a complex wing in solidworks flow simulation | niels1900 | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 6 | April 20, 2011 11:44 |
Continuous vs interrupted simulation | sega | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | November 3, 2008 15:29 |