|
[Sponsors] |
November 29, 2014, 17:18 |
Filling of empty tank using interFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Behzad
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi dears. I'm new to openfoam and I wanna simulate filling of an empty tank (full of air) using interFoam and vof and RNGkepsilon model. In my geometry there is a baffle. my inlet velocity is 0.03 m/s and the tank has 10m length and 1m height. I use adjustable time step so that the courant number set smaller than 1. I've confused because at the beginning of the simulation solution diverged even for laminar simulation in order to decreasing time step to 10^-34 and smaller. I set Co to 0.1 and refined the mesh but the problem was not resolved yet!! Can anyone help me???
Initial condition= alpha.water=0, U=0; boundary conditions: inlet: alpha.water=1, U=0.03, p-rgh=zeroGradient. outlet: I checked both of inletoutlet and zero gradient for alpha & U. atmosphere: zero total pressure for p-rgh. pressureInletOutlet velocity. |
|
November 29, 2014, 19:44 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Wouter van der Meer
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Elahuizen, Netherlands
Posts: 203
Rep Power: 18 |
dear behcfd,
Did you search the forum, because I answered a very similar question before: HTML Code:
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/137179-filling-tank-water.html hope this helps Wouter |
|
November 30, 2014, 16:09 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Behzad
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
Dear wouter, tnx a lot. I didn't find shared link before! I read the link but I have some questions yet! I don't understand which one of my boundary conditions is incorrect.
Do I have to change inlet p-rgh from zeroGradient to fixedFluxPressure and is this enough? and what is the physical reason of it? I didn't realize why in this problem the degrees of freedom is not equal to the number of variables. my problem is a little different from that post and my geometry is a channel so that the upper patch is atmosphere instead of wall and water leaves tha channel at outlet. I attached the simple form of my geometry...thanks |
|
December 7, 2014, 21:04 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Faraz
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi,
I did not understand the physics of your problem well. You have a vessel full of air and you want to fill it with liquid water, right? So why do you want to use turbulence model? Nevertheless, based on the given info and assuming you have a decent geometry and mesh, I recommend using the following BCs.: alpha: inlet { type inletOutlet; inletValue uniform 1; value uniform 1; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } p_rgh: inlet { type fixedFluxPressure; value uniform 1; } outlet { type totalPressure; p0 uniform 0; U U; phi phi; rho rho; psi none; gamma 1; value uniform 0; } U: outlet { type pressureInletOutletVelocity; value uniform (1 0 0); } and for the upper wall use the damBreak tutorial BCs for atmosphere.
__________________
Thermofluids for Energy and Advanced Materials (TEAM) Laboratory |
|
December 17, 2014, 13:30 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Behzad
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
Thanks dear faraz. yes, I have a channel full of air and I want to fill it with liquid water until water overflow from baffle. after overflow the state of flow becomes steady gradually. Inlet flow is turbulant and Re=3500 so i must use turbulence models like related papers.
I tried your suggested boundary conditions. but still my results are incorrect. near down-wall a big circulation region appear that is not correct! I don't know which of my boundary conditions are incorrect! |
|
December 17, 2014, 13:41 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
Faraz
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
Did it converge? How are you sure it is incorrect? Can you put a snapshot here?
Quote:
__________________
Thermofluids for Energy and Advanced Materials (TEAM) Laboratory |
||
December 17, 2014, 17:56 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Behzad
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
yes, I compared velocity profiles and steramlines nearly after 100sec from beginning of overflow. after this time the flow become nearly steadystate and the profiles don't change with time.
I compared my results with related paper and experimental results and they are very different! I attached the streamlines of water that is correct and my results. as you see for my simulation a circulation region appear near down-wall that is incorrect. |
|
December 17, 2014, 18:12 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
Faraz
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
What is the reference?
Quote:
__________________
Thermofluids for Energy and Advanced Materials (TEAM) Laboratory |
||
December 17, 2014, 18:56 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Behzad
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
Experimental and Numerical Approach to Enlargement of Performance of Primary Settling Tanks, A. Razmi, B. Firoozabadi, and G. Ahmadi.
you can download it from here: https://www.google.nl/url?sa=t&rct=j...82001339,d.d2s |
|
December 17, 2014, 19:36 |
|
#10 | |
New Member
Faraz
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
I can't say what is wrong based on the information I have. I guess the geometry might have a problem (there is no baffle in these simulations, right?). And I see a streamline at the left-up corner, which is strange, because no water should flow to that side, so check the left wall B.C. too. Also make sure no-slip B.C. is applied correctly to the walls.
Moreover, make sure the simulation has reached to steady state condition, reading this can be helpful: http://www.openfoam.org/version2.0.0/steady-vof.php Cheers, Faraz Quote:
__________________
Thermofluids for Energy and Advanced Materials (TEAM) Laboratory |
||
December 20, 2014, 17:04 |
|
#11 |
New Member
Behzad
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
thanks again dear faraz.
unfortunately I checked boundaries and geometry but I didn't find the reason of bad results! my geometry is like the paper. it hasn't any intermediate baffle (case1 in the paper). I feel confused a lot! |
|
August 21, 2017, 08:20 |
Help
|
#12 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
I am trying to solve water filling bottle tutorial from long back (http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kur...Hemida_VOF.pdf). I am not getting reasonable results. I used inlet velocity as 0.1 m/sec. I am attaching my FOAM files. Please kindly let me know what mistake I am doing. |
|
Tags |
courant number, interfoam diverging |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
interFoam / bubbleFoam to simulate an aerated tank | Meratb | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | November 6, 2020 12:45 |
Filling Tank with Water | leff | CFX | 7 | August 21, 2017 08:47 |
BCs to the outlet patch (filling a simple tank) | Ternox | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 4 | August 21, 2017 08:19 |
tank filling (water/air), I think I messed up the BCs | simpomann | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | August 21, 2017 08:16 |
interFoam/kOmegaSST tank filling with printStackError/Mules | simpomann | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | February 17, 2014 18:06 |