|
[Sponsors] |
December 1, 2014, 02:41 |
|
#101 |
Senior Member
Paritosh Vasava
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 732
Rep Power: 23 |
Quickly, if I were you I would not use fixedValue for inlet velocity if I am specifying pressure at the inlet. Instead use pressureInletOutletVelocity.
Also you are using fixed temperature at the outlet. Do you already know the temperature or you want openfoam to calculate the temperature? I would use fixed temperature at inlet and inletOutlet at outlet for temperature. Please provide error messages, material properties and boundary files in the /0 folder. |
|
December 2, 2014, 03:58 |
|
#102 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 14 |
I would specify total pressure and temperature at the inlet and static pressure at the outlet. Most of the time, defining a uniform velocity profile at the inlet is rather nonphysical.
You could use pressureInletOutletVelocity for the U at the boundarie. |
|
December 2, 2014, 10:39 |
|
#103 |
Member
Christian
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 12 |
thank you for the replies.
As you recommended, I specified the temperature at inlet and inletOutlet at outlet, and pressureInletVelocity for U at inlet. If someone is interested, the same BCs do not converge on rhoSimpleFoam if I refine the mesh! |
|
December 2, 2014, 10:43 |
|
#104 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 14 |
Have you tried lowering the relaxation factors when using the finer mesh?
|
|
December 3, 2014, 08:04 |
|
#105 |
Member
Christian
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 12 |
Not really - I should check it, but I think it's more a SIMPLE algorithm problem than a matter of relaxation factors
|
|
December 3, 2014, 08:23 |
|
#106 | |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Quote:
Relaxation and SIMPLE is like a married couple (: Without relaxation you will not can run SIMPLE in complex cases. This is due to some missing terms in the pressure prediction (see also Ferziger and Peric).
__________________
Keep foaming, Tobias Holzmann |
||
December 6, 2014, 07:59 |
|
#107 |
Member
Christian
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 12 |
You are right - I meant it is possibly due to the fact that it is a very unsteady case and is probably not the best case to use SIMPLE - I am having good results with PIMPLE solvers so I'll stick to that for now
|
|
December 9, 2014, 14:38 |
|
#108 |
Member
Christian
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 12 |
I am having AMI floating point exception problems when restarting the simulation from latestTime.
I got the same problem first when running renumberMesh in parallel after decomposePar - running rhoPimpleDyMFoam after decomposePar solved the problem. Any ideas on how to solve this AMI issue at restart? Maybe someone had the same problem! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Study of the EEqn.H in rhoPimpleDyMFoam. | Horacio Aguerre | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 11 | August 19, 2022 03:47 |
Developing a rhoPimpleDyMFoam solver | bvieira | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 20 | October 9, 2014 13:12 |
rhoPimpleDymFoam | jvd.mechanic | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | June 15, 2014 06:20 |
Divergence in rhoPimpleDyMFoam | bvieira | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | July 19, 2012 03:22 |