|
[Sponsors] |
May 6, 2014, 07:04 |
rhoSimpleFoam. patchField error.
|
#1 |
New Member
Victor
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello dear friends.
I read a lot of staff about rhoSimpleFoam, but still have the problem. I have a calculated simpleFoam case. So I need to continue this case with rhoSimpleFoam or make a new rhoSimpleFoam case with the same geometry. I have this error when I try execute rhoSimpleFoam: --> FOAM FATAL IO ERROR: Cannot find patchField entry for cyclic PERIODIC_1 Is your field uptodate with split cyclics? Run foamUpgradeCyclics to convert mesh and fields to split cyclics. file: /home/studenten/stud-viti/OpenFOAM/run/rhoSimpleFoam/Test_Blade3D_rhosimpleFoam/10000/T.boundaryField from line 25 to line 51. From function GeometricField<Type, PatchField, GeoMesh>::GeometricBoundaryField::readField(const DimensionedField<Type, GeoMesh>&, const dictionary&) in file /sw/openfoam/OpenFOAM-2.2.0/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/GeometricBoundaryField.C at line 137. Does anybody know how to fix this problem? With best regards, Victor. |
|
May 30, 2014, 10:26 |
Please, share yout working rhoSimpleFoam case
|
#2 |
New Member
Victor
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello dear foamers,
I always have this problem when I execute my rhoSimpleFoam case. --> FOAM FATAL IO ERROR: Cannot find patchField entry for PERIODIC_1 file: /home/studenten/stud-viti/OpenFOAM/run/rhoSimpleFoam/Test_Blade3D_rhosimpleFoam/0/T.boundaryField from line 25 to line 53. Could you please share with me your working rhoSimpleFoam case? or maybe just 0 folder with initial conditions? Or Maybe somebody knows how to fix the patchField problem? FYI, PERIODIC_1 is cyclic. Thank you in advance! Yours Victor |
|
May 31, 2014, 10:19 |
|
#3 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings Victor,
You're not giving us much information to work with. Please follow the indications given here: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...-get-help.html Because even if you do have a patch "PERIODIC_1" defined in the mesh, is does not mean that it's defined in the "T" file, as indicated by the error message you're getting. Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
|
June 4, 2014, 13:47 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Victor
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello Bruno.
Sorry about that. Hope now there is enough information. This is the "T" file Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; object T; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 0 0 1 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 293; boundaryField { INLET { type fixedValue; value uniform 573; } OUTLET { type outletInlet; outletValue uniform 473 } PERIODIC_1 { type cyclicAMI; value $internalField; } PERIODIC_2 { type cyclicAMI; value $internalField; } SYMM_01 { type symmetryPlane; } SYMM_02 { type symmetryPlane; } BLADE { type zeroGradient; } } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // Create time Create polyMesh for time = 0 Time = 0 Mesh stats points: 161984 faces: 438046 internal faces: 391622 cells: 138278 faces per cell: 6 boundary patches: 7 point zones: 0 face zones: 1 cell zones: 1 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 138278 prisms: 0 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 0 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology INLET 595 688 ok (non-closed singly connected) OUTLET 595 688 ok (non-closed singly connected) SYMM_01 19754 20248 ok (non-closed singly connected) SYMM_02 19754 20248 ok (non-closed singly connected) BLADE 2002 2288 ok (non-closed singly connected) PERIODIC_1 1862 2136 ok (non-closed singly connected) PERIODIC_2 1862 2136 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-25 -25.9025 -3) (60 54.4534 8.7357e-14) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (-2.07415e-16 9.12562e-17 -4.97004e-16) OK. Max cell openness = 4.11197e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 18.3439 OK. Minimum face area = 0.00288281. Maximum face area = 0.41332. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 0.00123693. Max volume = 0.177136. Total volume = 8819.72. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 64.6599 average: 17.1442 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 1.71078 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Mesh OK. End 83,0-1 Bot Code:
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // 7 ( INLET { type patch; nFaces 595; startFace 391622; } OUTLET { type patch; nFaces 595; startFace 392217; } SYMM_01 { type symmetryPlane; inGroups 1(symmetryPlane); nFaces 19754; startFace 392812; } SYMM_02 { type symmetryPlane; inGroups 1(symmetryPlane); nFaces 19754; startFace 412566; } BLADE { type wall; nFaces 2002; startFace 432320; } PERIODIC_1 { type cyclicAMI; inGroups 1(cyclic); nFaces 1862; startFace 434322; matchTolerance 1; transform translational; neighbourPatch PERIODIC_2; separationVector (-1 0 0); } PERIODIC_2 { type cyclicAMI; inGroups 1(cyclic); nFaces 1862; startFace 436184; matchTolerance 1; transform translational; neighbourPatch PERIODIC_1; separationVector (1 0 0); } ) // ************************************************************************* // Thank you in advance, Victor |
|
June 6, 2014, 16:22 |
|
#5 | |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Hi Victor,
OK, here's a very important detail - in the first post, if you look carefully, there is this path: Quote:
Which might very likely mean that the file "system/controlDict" is configured with this setting: Code:
startFrom latestTime; Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Building OpenFOAM1.7.0 from source | ata | OpenFOAM Installation | 46 | March 6, 2022 14:21 |
[blockMesh] blockMesh with double grading. | spwater | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 92 | January 12, 2019 10:00 |
[OpenFOAM] Native ParaView Reader Bugs | tj22 | ParaView | 270 | January 4, 2016 12:39 |
Ansys Fluent 13.0 UDF compilation problem in Window XP (32 bit) | Yogini | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 7 | October 3, 2012 08:24 |
c++ libraries and solver compiling | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Installation | 13 | February 3, 2012 18:43 |