|
[Sponsors] |
OF2.3: GAMG Processor Agglomeration when solving for p_rgh |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Jens Peterson
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Hello all,
I'm currently working on a problem using the buoyantPimpleFoam solver, which solves for p_rgh instead of p. I thought I'd give the new processor agglomeration option in the GAMG solver a shot, but I'm having difficulties getting it to work. I'm using the GAMG solver for the p_rgh equation, and the h equation. When i use it in the h equation, it works (prints out statistics in the run log), but nothing seems to happen when i use it for the p_rgh equation. Am I missing something, or is it simply not an option here? All the best // Jens |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
gamg, processoragglomerator |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 06:20 |
Unstabil Simulation with chtMultiRegionFoam | mbay101 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | December 28, 2013 13:12 |
pimpleFoam: turbulence->correct(); is not executed when using residualControl | hfs | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 29, 2013 08:35 |
calculation stops after few time steps | sivakumar | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 17, 2013 06:37 |
Differences between serial and parallel runs | carsten | OpenFOAM Bugs | 11 | September 12, 2008 11:16 |