|
[Sponsors] |
buoyantSimpleFoam, problem with additional heat flux |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 11, 2014, 11:52 |
buoyantSimpleFoam, problem with additional heat flux
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello
I use buoyantSimpleFoam solver. I have a box 1x1x1.4m with inlet, outlet and two heating boxes inside. My BC U Code:
dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (0 0 0); boundaryField { wall { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 1); } outlet { type inletOutlet; inletValue uniform (0 0 0); value uniform (0 0 0); } grzalka_1 { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } grzalka_2 { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } } T Code:
dimensions [ 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ]; internalField uniform 293; boundaryField { wall { type zeroGradient; } inlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 293; } outlet { type zeroGradient; } grzalka_1 { type compressible::turbulentHeatFluxTemperature; heatSource power; q uniform 0; kappa fluidThermo; Qr none; kappaName none; value uniform 293; } grzalka_2 { type compressible::turbulentHeatFluxTemperature; heatSource power; q uniform 55; kappa fluidThermo; Qr none; kappaName none; value uniform 293; } } // ************************************************************************* // Code:
dimensions [ 1 -1 -2 0 0 0 0 ]; internalField uniform 101325; boundaryField { wall { type zeroGradient; } inlet { type zeroGradient; } outlet { type fixedValue; value uniform 101325; } grzalka_1 { type zeroGradient; } grzalka_2 { type zeroGradient; } } // ************************************************************************* // But if I set g=0 [m/s^2] additional massflow disappear (!) I have the same problem with buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam (addtional mass flow and very high temperatures). My simulation crashes after 1800 steps. I have this problem with different meshes. It is a bug? Anyone have similar problem? |
|
March 12, 2014, 10:01 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello
I know what was wrong. The correct set for p_rgh for all walls (grzalka_1, grzalka_2 and wall) is fixedFluxPressure, not zeroGradient. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
heat flux balance problem | zhouziyi7123 | FLUENT | 5 | May 21, 2014 04:37 |
Enforce bounds error with heat loss boundary condition at solid walls | Chander | CFX | 2 | May 1, 2012 21:11 |
problem with heat flux in the wall | gholamghar | FLUENT | 1 | September 14, 2010 08:47 |
Heat Flux Wall Boundary Confusion. | Joee | FLUENT | 1 | August 21, 2010 13:20 |
Basic question: UDF for wall heat flux | Carl | FLUENT | 1 | August 5, 2006 20:01 |