CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

2D isothermal cylinder not converging

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 9, 2014, 04:08
Default 2D isothermal cylinder not converging
  #1
New Member
 
Kramer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13
UPengineer is on a distinguished road
Hello Everyone,

I am using OpenFOAM version 2.2.2 with HelyxOS 2.0 on Ubuntu 13.10. I am looking at a 2D natural convective flow from an isothermally heated cylinder.

The mesh I have may be seen below:


There is a 1.5 m by 1.5 m box surrounding the cylinder with 4X refinement.

The boundary conditions are:

Code:
Wall -->Fixed, no slip - zero gradient temperature for: front face, back face, left face and right face.

Wall --> 350 K isothermal temperature for the cylinder

Patch --> Velocity: Pressure Inlet velocity
               Pressure: Total pressure = 0 m^2/s^2
               For the top face

Patch --> Velocity: Pressure Inlet Outlet
                   Pressure: Zero gradient
                  For the Bottom face
The Solution Modeling is:
Code:
SIMPLE FOAM algorithm
2nd Order Bounded Linear Upwind for velocity and temperatureSteady
Incompressible
Laminar
With thermal energy on and buoyancy on (gravity set to -9.81 m/s^2)
The residuals are:


As you can see, the residuals are anything but convergent which makes me think the boundary conditions may be a little messed up.

An example of the temperature post processing of the case is:


which appears to be correct, however because of the residuals I cannot trust this data.

Any advice on how to get my case to converge? Any help is appreciated.
UPengineer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 9, 2014, 12:31
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Joachim Herb
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 650
Rep Power: 22
jherb is on a distinguished road
What solver are you using? With or without Boussinesq approximation? Have you tried the same setup with a transient simulation (pimple)?

Perhaps also the area below the cylinder is to short.
jherb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 9, 2014, 16:30
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Kramer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13
UPengineer is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jherb View Post
What solver are you using? With or without Boussinesq approximation? Have you tried the same setup with a transient simulation (pimple)?

Perhaps also the area below the cylinder is to short.
Hello jherb,

Thank you for your help and quick reply.

I did as you suggested by extending the area below the cylinder.
Unfortunately, the residuals did not converge any better.

The mesh is now:


Which output residuals seen:


For your other questions/suggestions:

I am using buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam as the solver, so yes I am using the Boussinesq approximation.

Would transient simulation be too overkill since I do not have any time dependent variables? There is nothing cooling, heating, or filling a space. It is just the heat from an isothermally heated cylinder.

I hope this may help pinpoint what my problem is. If there is any other questions for my case setup that may help OpenFOAM run this case I will do my best to explain everything I know.

Last edited by UPengineer; March 9, 2014 at 16:37. Reason: Residuals not posted
UPengineer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2014, 06:14
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Joachim Herb
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 650
Rep Power: 22
jherb is on a distinguished road
Unfortunately, all pictures in this thread are gone.

Your problem might be a common problem with the SIMPLE algorithm, RANS and long wavelength/low frequency oscillations. These are not handled correctly by SIMPLE because the eddies are not correctly treated by the RANS averaging. So you get some kind of vortex shedding in stationary simulations. See also this thread:
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...m-results.html

With a pimple simulation you can check, if your boundary conditions works. Perhaps you can also use a converged solution of (one time step of) a pimple simulation as initial guess for your simple simulation.



Quote:
Originally Posted by UPengineer View Post
Hello jherb,

Thank you for your help and quick reply.

I did as you suggested by extending the area below the cylinder.
Unfortunately, the residuals did not converge any better.

The mesh is now:


Which output residuals seen:


For your other questions/suggestions:

I am using buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam as the solver, so yes I am using the Boussinesq approximation.

Would transient simulation be too overkill since I do not have any time dependent variables? There is nothing cooling, heating, or filling a space. It is just the heat from an isothermally heated cylinder.

I hope this may help pinpoint what my problem is. If there is any other questions for my case setup that may help OpenFOAM run this case I will do my best to explain everything I know.
jherb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2014, 14:53
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Kramer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13
UPengineer is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your suggestion jherb, though I am not really sure how to implement it.

After continuously changing boundary conditions I saw that the hole where the cylinder is causes a lot of disruption for the incoming velocity of the bottom face. This made me try again with a new fully meshed model.

However after troubleshooting it became clear that I have a problem with retaining heat even with the patch on bottom and top since it seems that the heat circulates as if it were a cyclic boundary.

Is there a way to make the top face just expel all heat and velocity? To make either OpenFOAM think it is an infinitely tall wall or just allow everything to pass through? An open boundary condition?
UPengineer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2014, 20:15
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Joachim Herb
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 650
Rep Power: 22
jherb is on a distinguished road
Could you post your fvSolution and fvSchemes files? And also the files in 0 time directory? Have you tried zeroGradient for the outlet (top) as boundary condition for U?
jherb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2014, 21:38
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Kramer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13
UPengineer is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jherb View Post
Could you post your fvSolution and fvSchemes files? And also the files in 0 time directory? Have you tried zeroGradient for the outlet (top) as boundary condition for U?
Thank you very much for your continued help and time with my project. The case that matches most close to reality is slightly different than the original case.

I found that the P_(rgh) that openFOAM uses is in units m^2/s^2 so it does not actually include any density. So bottom condition is a total pressure of (35m)(9.81m/s^2) = 343.35 m^2/s^2

The case is as follows:

Mesh:


FvSolutions:
Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
|       o          |                                                          |
|    o     o       | HELYX-OS                                                  |
|   o   O   o      | Version: v2.0.0                                           |
|    o     o       | Web:     http://www.engys.com                            |
|       o          |                                                          |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
    version 2.0;
    format ascii;
    class dictionary;
    location system;
    object fvSolution;
}

    SIMPLE
    {
        nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 0;
        pressureImplicitPorousity false;
        pRefCell 0;
        pRefValue 0;
    }

    solvers
    {
        p
        {
            solver GAMG;
            agglomerator faceAreaPair;
            mergeLevels 1;
            cacheAgglomeration true;
            nCellsInCoarsestLevel 200;
            tolerance 1e-7;
            relTol 0.01;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            nPreSweeps 0;
            nPostSweeps 2;
            nFinestSweeps 2;
            minIter 1;
        }

        p_rgh
        {
            solver GAMG;
            agglomerator faceAreaPair;
            mergeLevels 1;
            cacheAgglomeration true;
            nCellsInCoarsestLevel 200;
            tolerance 1e-7;
            relTol 0.01;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            nPreSweeps 0;
            nPostSweeps 2;
            nFinestSweeps 2;
            minIter 1;
        }

        f
        {
            solver GAMG;
            agglomerator faceAreaPair;
            mergeLevels 1;
            cacheAgglomeration true;
            nCellsInCoarsestLevel 200;
            tolerance 1e-7;
            relTol 0.01;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            nPreSweeps 0;
            nPostSweeps 2;
            nFinestSweeps 2;
            minIter 1;
        }

        U
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        k
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        kl
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        kt
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        q
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        zeta
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        epsilon
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        R
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        nuTilda
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        omega
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        h
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        T
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        v2
        {
            solver smoothSolver;
            smoother GaussSeidel;
            tolerance 1e-6;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

        rho
        {
            solver PCG;
            preconditioner DIC;
            tolerance 0;
            relTol 0;
            minIter 1;
        }

        rhoFinal
        {
            solver PCG;
            preconditioner DIC;
            tolerance 0;
            relTol 0;
            minIter 1;
        }

        e
        {
            solver PBiCG;
            preconditioner DILU;
            tolerance 1e-06;
            relTol 0.1;
            minIter 1;
        }

    }

    relaxationFactors
    {
        fields
        {
            p_rgh 0.5;
            p 0.3;
            rho 0.05;
        }

        equations
        {
            U 0.7;
            h 0.5;
            k 0.7;
            kl 0.7;
            kt 0.7;
            q 0.7;
            zeta 0.7;
            epsilon 0.7;
            R 0.7;
            nuTilda 0.7;
            omega 0.7;
            T 0.7;
            v2 0.7;
            f 0.7;
        }

    }
FvSchemes:


Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
|       o          |                                                          |
|    o     o       | HELYX-OS                                                  |
|   o   O   o      | Version: v2.0.0                                           |
|    o     o       | Web:     http://www.engys.com                            |
|       o          |                                                          |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
    version 2.0;
    format ascii;
    class dictionary;
    location system;
    object fvSchemes;
}

    ddtSchemes
    {
        default steadyState;
    }

    gradSchemes
    {
        default Gauss linear;
        grad(nuTilda) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(k) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(kl) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(omega) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(epsilon) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(q) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(zeta) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(v2) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(f) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(sqrt(kt)) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(kt) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
        grad(sqrt(kl)) cellLimited Gauss linear 1;
    }

    divSchemes
    {
        default Gauss linear;
        div(phi,U) bounded Gauss linearUpwindV grad(U);
        div(phi,k) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(k);
        div(phi,epsilon) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(epsilon);
        div(phi,zeta) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(zeta);
        div(phi,q) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(q);
        div(phi,omega) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(omega);
        div(phi,nuTilda) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(nuTilda);
        div(phi,T) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(T);
        div(phi,kl) Gauss limitedLinear 1;
        div(phi,kt) Gauss limitedLinear 1;
        div(phi,R) Gauss upwind;
        div(R) Gauss linear;
        div((nuEff*dev(grad(U).T()))) Gauss linear;
        div(phi,v2) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(v2);
        div(phi,f) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(f);
    }

    fluxRequired
    {
        default no;
        p_rgh ;
        p ;
    }

    interpolationSchemes
    {
        default linear;
        interpolate(HbyA) linear;
    }

    laplacianSchemes
    {
        default Gauss linear limited 0.333;
    }

    snGradSchemes
    {
        default limited 0.333;
    }
Residuals:


Outputs at time=1000s

Velocity:


Pressure:


Temperature:



This was the best I could do after spending many many hours changing boundary conditions, mesh, relaxation factor for pressure, and etc...

Some questions I still have for this simulation:
  • Why is the pressure negative at the top, when it was specified to have a total pressure of 0 m^2/s^2?
  • Why do I have such a high velocity? It makes me believe that this is somewhat forced convection instead of natural convection.
  • Any other advice to make it more realistic to natural convection?


Again thank you jherb for your extended time and help!
UPengineer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2014, 06:17
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Joachim Herb
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 650
Rep Power: 22
jherb is on a distinguished road
I would suggest that you start over with a very simple geometry, e.g. the hot room tutorial for buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam. Then change the boundary conditions of this example so you have open patches at the bottom and the top. Due to the "hot spot" at the bottom (created by the setFields command in the Allrun script) you should also get natural circulation.

(Be carefull that the T boundary condition in 0/T is overwritten by the 0/T.org file)

If this works you can start with your mesh.

P.S. Your pictures/graphs are gone again.
jherb is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
boundary, conditions, helyxos 2.0, isothermal, openfoam 2.2.2


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Incorrect Drag and Drag Coefficient for flow over a cylinder ozzythewise Main CFD Forum 8 June 13, 2012 07:24
convection from an isothermal horizontal cylinder engahmed Main CFD Forum 0 April 19, 2011 13:27
Not converging flow around cylinder with Re=1000000. Help please! Wotild ANSYS 5 December 7, 2010 22:07
Not converging flow around cylinder with Re=1000000. Help please! Wotild ANSYS 0 December 3, 2010 10:50
[blockMesh] Specifying boundary faces failes in blockMesh blaise OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 May 10, 2010 04:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26.