|
[Sponsors] |
Difference between results in interFoam and interDyMFoam |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 29, 2014, 09:31 |
Difference between results in interFoam and interDyMFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Philipp Schulze
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to simulate a Toluene droplet rising in water. As a first approach I've simply chosen a static mesh hence using interFoam. The results seem to be in good agreement with experiments and other simulations found in the literature. To reduce the size of the computational domain I tried to simulate the same system using the solver interDyMFoam. The velocity of the mesh was first chosen to be a constant (with reagard to time and space), i.e. independently of the droplet velocity. As a consequence the resulting droplet velocity is significantly different from the solution obtained with interFoam and strongly dependent on the mesh velocity! I've tried to refine the mesh and/or the time step, but without any significant improvement. I obtained the droplet velocity by calculating the centroid of the Toluene phase every time step. Does anybody have experienced a similar problem and was able to fix it? I would really appreciate any ideas and suggestions. Thank you in advance! |
|
Tags |
droplet, interdymfoam, interfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Viscous forces (interDyMFoam) differ between OF 2.0 and later versions | maxof | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | May 30, 2013 05:17 |
InterFoam vs InterDyMFoam | Rose2011 | OpenFOAM | 4 | March 6, 2013 11:56 |
Slow interFoam compared with other CFD tools? | Ralph M | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | November 17, 2010 07:46 |
Interfoam Droplet under shear test case | adona058 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | May 3, 2010 19:46 |
alpha or alpha1 in interFoam & interDyMFoam | wavytracy | OpenFOAM Bugs | 3 | September 10, 2009 03:51 |