|
[Sponsors] |
November 28, 2013, 20:34 |
Droplet deposition on surface using OpenFOAM
|
#1 |
New Member
Sagnik
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi, I am trying to model droplet deposition on a surface with a specific contact angle, just like:
http://aisberg.unibg.it/bitstream/10...2012_23-32.pdf using OpenFOAM. I started with a simple 2D case, following the guidelines of the dambreak case setup and as suggested in the paper. I am specifying: type constantAlphaContactAngle; theta0 60; limit gradient; for the droplet deposition surface. I want the final steady state contact angle to be 60 (degrees) as done in the paper. But when I run the simulations with the given setup: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...oplet_case.zip instead of depositing as a droplet, the liquid starts to flow as in the dambreak case. I wonder what is wrong with my setup. Thanks a lot for all the help and guidance. sincerely Sagnik PS: I have tried to contact the author of the paper but could not get in touch. |
|
November 29, 2013, 07:30 |
|
#2 |
Member
Michiel
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Delft, Netherlands
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Sagnik,
I have taken a look at your case and I have a couple of suggestions: 1) for the pressure on the boundary where you set constantAlphaContactAngle it is best to use Code:
type fixedFluxPressure; adjoint no; The last point is actually the main issue: I can't check everything because your blockMeshDict doesn't match the included mesh. |
|
November 30, 2013, 12:32 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Sagnik
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi Michiel:
Thanks a lot for your suggestion. Your pressure setting did the trick. So that others can also benefit, I have simulated 2 cases with contact angles of 60 and 120 with 10000 cells only to show that it works. It can be downloaded from: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...coursemesh.zip The folder contains the results at each 0.01s for 0.1s. The ppt in the folder shows the initial and final contours. You could not see the correct blockmesh file as it was generated from a .msh fluent file using the 'fluentMeshToFoam' converter. The .msh file is in the contact angle 60 case folder. I also wonder if we should use the same pressure BC for all the other walls in the domain as well ! Thanks for all the help. Sagnik |
|
December 1, 2013, 10:28 |
|
#4 |
Member
Michiel
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Delft, Netherlands
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 16 |
Glad I could help!
Just a final suggestion. I'm not sure what your future plans with this type of simulation are, but if you are interested in the dynamics of droplet deposition than you should consider using a dynamic contact angle boundary condition. Also, if you are not going to do droplets falling from a height then you might want to cut a part of your mesh at the top, because you are simulating a lot of 'empty' space now. |
|
December 2, 2013, 00:26 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Sagnik
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks Michiel. Yes, we do have plans to do extensive work on the topic. Do you have any suggestions for appropriate references on the topic especially related to OpenFOAM ! It would surely be of great help. I have looked a bit on the use of dynamic contact angle from:
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...act-angle.html Thanks again for all the help. Sagnik |
|
December 5, 2013, 04:48 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
Hi,
I wonder why you do not consider the "Finite Area Method (FAM) which comes with OF 1.6-ext" http://www.openfoamworkshop.org/2009...sak_slides.pdf there is a "(not really) similar" method introduced with OF 2.0 http://www.openfoam.org/version2.0.0/surface-film.php but many say FAM has still an advantage |
|
December 5, 2013, 05:26 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30 |
Elvis, the MMIT method is great, but does not include any contact angle implementation. Also if at any point topological changes are to be considered, things will get tough (but not impossible) with MMIT.
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit *Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer. |
|
February 7, 2016, 09:54 |
|
#8 |
Member
Camille Bilger
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi Sagnik ,
would it be possible to get your test case as provided a few years ago? :-) as I am trying to gather ideas on how to simulate a droplet splashing onto a wall with contact angle. camille.bilger@free.fr |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Snap Precision to a STL Surface | malaboss | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 16 | July 26, 2013 02:44 |
[snappyHexMesh] Layers don't fully surround surface | EVBUCF | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 14 | August 20, 2012 05:31 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Surface Body Named Selections for OpenFoam | slowtype | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | April 20, 2011 11:35 |
64bitrhel5 OF installation instructions | mirko | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | August 12, 2008 19:07 |
CFX4.3 -build analysis form | Chie Min | CFX | 5 | July 13, 2001 00:19 |