CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

simpleFoam crashing

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 26, 2013, 02:13
Default simpleFoam crashing
  #1
Senior Member
 
jeff osborne
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 108
Rep Power: 16
ozzythewise is on a distinguished road
Hello all,

I have a fairly straight-forward problem that for some reason I am having difficulties with. I am trying to model flow in a 2D pipe that makes a sharp "U" shape with simpleFoam, but after a few iterations it crashes and I can't decipher the error. I've reproduced the error below.

I've checked all my BCs and they seem to be as they want as this is usually the problem with this type of error. I've included my case below as well. If I had to hazard a guess it would be a problem with my turbulence modelling BCs (using kEpsilon model), as my values for epsilon and k become unstable after an iteration.

If anyone has any thoughts on this it would be very appreciated. I'm pretty stuck with ways to fix this at the moment.

Thanks!

Link to case: http://www.speedyshare.com/zEfdF/NozzleHT.tar.gz

Sorry that the link isn't on the forum, was too large to upload

ERROR MESSAGE

Code:
Time = 6

DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 0.99859, Final residual = 219004, No Iterations 1001
DILUPBiCG:  Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 3.45633e-05, Final residual = 9.03368e-06, No Iterations 3
DICPCG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 5.01613e-07, No Iterations 12
time step continuity errors : sum local = 8.09745e+121, global = -5.25148e+107, cumulative = -5.25148e+107
#0  Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) in "/opt/openfoam211/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so"
#1  Foam::sigFpe::sigHandler(int) in "/opt/openfoam211/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so"
#2   in "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6"
#3  Foam::PBiCG::solve(Foam::Field<double>&, Foam::Field<double> const&, unsigned char) const in "/opt/openfoam211/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/lib/libOpenFOAM.so"
#4  Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve(Foam::dictionary const&) in "/opt/openfoam211/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/lib/libfiniteVolume.so"
#5  Foam::fvMatrix<double>::solve() in "/opt/openfoam211/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/lib/libincompressibleRASModels.so"
#6  Foam::incompressible::RASModels::kEpsilon::correct() in "/opt/openfoam211/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/lib/libincompressibleRASModels.so"
#7  
 in "/opt/openfoam211/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/bin/simpleFoam"
#8  __libc_start_main in "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6"
#9  
 in "/opt/openfoam211/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/bin/simpleFoam"
Floating point exception (core dumped)
ozzythewise is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 26, 2013, 07:31
Default Add in relaxation factors
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 16
Antimony is on a distinguished road
Hi,

You might want to try adding in some relaxation factors for the solver in fvSolution file. I have noticed that that helps in making things a little better (the number of iterations hit by the epsilon and p solvers was 1001 and that is never a good thing). Also, you might want to put the relTol at a non-zero value say 0.1 or something. So far I have been able to run your simulation for around 60 steps and haven't had any blow up. So maybe that is the fix you require. The relaxation parameters I used are below:

relaxationFactors
{
fields
{
p 0.3;
}
equations
{
U 0.5;
k 0.5;
"epsilon|omega" 0.5;
}
}

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Antimony
Antimony is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 26, 2013, 09:46
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
jeff osborne
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 108
Rep Power: 16
ozzythewise is on a distinguished road
yep, that totally fixed it. Thanks a million!
ozzythewise is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 27, 2013, 18:30
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
jeff osborne
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 108
Rep Power: 16
ozzythewise is on a distinguished road
I wanted to follow-up on this problem actually. I was able to solve the flow without an issue, but what I'm trying to do now is use scalarTransportFoam to find temperature distributions throughout the flow field (steady-state temperature). I am having a similar issue where the temperature field is unstable, but cannot get it to stabilize (including playing with relaxation factors and relTol). I have included my solution below. If anyone has any ideas for this that would be more than appreciated.

Link to case: http://www.speedyshare.com/5VVY8/NozzleScalar.tar.gz
ozzythewise is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 27, 2013, 21:26
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 16
Antimony is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I just did a quick check on your mesh using the checkMesh utility and it seems that there are a lot of highly skewed elements (300 odd) and probably that is affecting the quality of the results.

You might want to remesh and see if you can get a better one.

Regards,

Antimony
Antimony is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
interFoam vs. simpleFoam channel flow comparison DanM OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 January 31, 2020 16:26
simpleFoam parallel AndrewMortimer OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 August 7, 2015 19:45
Laminar simpleFoam and inviscid simpleFoam herenger OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 July 11, 2013 07:27
Trying to run a benchmark case with simpleFoam spsb OpenFOAM 3 February 24, 2012 10:07
Naca0012 k-e mpirun gives fpe whereas simpleFoam not Pierpaolo OpenFOAM 1 May 8, 2010 04:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:49.