|
[Sponsors] |
SimpleFoam convergence problem with really simple simulation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 6, 2013, 02:04 |
SimpleFoam convergence problem with really simple simulation
|
#1 |
Member
India
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi Foamers,
I am facing SimpleFoam convergence problem with a really basic simulation i.e steady state flow simulation in a single bifurcation tube by specifying fully developed velocity profile at inlet(using swak4Foam toolbox). After digging through various threads related to convergence problem, I tried changing divergence schemes, played with relaxation factors and tried grid refinement but nothing helped. Situation became so bad the case is not converging using first order upwind scheme let one second order schemes. Below are some details of my case set up: 1.) Mesh is generated on ANSYS ICEM using tetrahedral and prism elements. My model contains about 0.6 million elements. 2.) checkMesh result: Create time Create polyMesh for time = 0 Time = 0 Mesh stats points: 195781 faces: 1354300 internal faces: 1310124 cells: 603415 boundary patches: 4 point zones: 0 face zones: 1 cell zones: 1 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 0 prisms: 250764 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 352651 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces ... Patch Faces Points Surface topology WALL 41794 20988 ok (non-closed singly connected) INLET 1047 787 ok (non-closed singly connected) OUTLET1 666 523 ok (non-closed singly connected) OUTLET2 669 528 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-0.108855 -0.161689 -0.01905) (0.108855 0.127 0.01905) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (6.33376e-17 2.25628e-17 -1.46543e-16) OK. Max cell openness = 3.10378e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 18.7479 OK. Minumum face area = 1.85691e-07. Maximum face area = 4.16397e-06. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 1.38121e-11. Max volume = 2.46223e-09. Total volume = 0.000347757. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 76.7538 average: 13.2348 *Number of severely non-orthogonal faces: 1. Non-orthogonality check OK. <<Writing 1 non-orthogonal faces to set nonOrthoFaces Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 2.96438 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Mesh OK. End 3.) 0/U file Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volVectorField; object U; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (0 -0.172 0); boundaryField { INLET { type groovyBC; variables "r2=(pow(pos().x,2)+pow(pos().z,2));R2=pow(0.019,2);para=-((R2-r2)/R2)*normal();"; valueExpression "2*0.172*para"; //where 0.351 is the average velocity value uniform (0 0 0); } WALL { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } OUTLET1 { type flowRateInletVelocity; flowRateExpression "0"; flowRate swak { variables "phi1{INLET}=-0.52*0.172*sum(area());"; expression "phi1"; // volume flow going out of domain from outlet 1 which 0.52 times that at inlet valueType patch; patchName OUTLET1;}; value uniform ( 0 0 0 ); } OUTLET2 { type zeroGradient; } } Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; object p; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform 0; boundaryField { INLET { type zeroGradient; } OUTLET1 { type zeroGradient; } OUTLET2 { type fixedValue; value uniform 0; } WALL { type zeroGradient; } } Code:
fvSchemes FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "system"; object fvSchemes; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // ddtSchemes { default steadyState; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; grad(p) Gauss linear; grad(U) Gauss linear; } divSchemes { default none; div(phi,U) Gauss upwind; div(phi,nuTilda) Gauss upwind grad(nuTilda); div((nuEff*dev(T(grad(U))))) Gauss linear; } laplacianSchemes { default none; laplacian(nuEff,U) Gauss linear limited 0.333; laplacian((1|A(U)),p) Gauss linear limited 0.333; laplacian(DnuTildaEff,nuTilda) Gauss linear limited 0.333; laplacian(1,p) Gauss linear limited 0.333; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; interpolate(U) linear; } snGradSchemes { default limited 0.333; } fluxRequired { default no; p ; } // ****************************************************// Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.1.1 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "system"; object fvSolution; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // solvers { p { solver GAMG; tolerance 1e-02; relTol 0.1; smoother GaussSeidel; nPreSweeps 0; nPostSweeps 2; cacheAgglomeration true; nCellsInCoarsestLevel 10; agglomerator faceAreaPair; mergeLevels 1; } U { solver smoothSolver; smoother GaussSeidel; nSweeps 2; tolerance 1e-02; relTol 0.1; } nuTilda { solver smoothSolver; smoother GaussSeidel; nSweeps 2; tolerance 1e-02; relTol 0.1; } } SIMPLE { nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 2; pRefCell 0; pRefValue 0; residualControl { p 1e-4; U 1e-4; nuTilda 1e-4; } } relaxationFactors { fields { p 0.9; } equations { U 0.1; nuTilda 0.2; } } // ************************************************************************* // |
|
November 6, 2013, 05:21 |
|
#2 |
Member
India
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 14 |
ok, one improvement on my part. I got it converged for first order upwind scheme but still no luck with second schemes(SFDCV, linearUpwind etc). I took first order result and used it for my simulation with second order divergence scheme but with no luck.
|
|
November 19, 2013, 06:28 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
Hi, did you try to use some limiters on the gradients? Sounds like this could be a problem here, since first order works and second order doesn't.
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Convergence of jet flow simulation | MiraLisa | FLUENT | 0 | August 15, 2013 05:44 |
SimpleFoam Convergence problem | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | May 31, 2013 04:21 |
Force can not converge | colopolo | CFX | 13 | October 4, 2011 23:03 |
2D SST Simulation Airfoil - Convergence Problem | Kraemer | CFX | 10 | April 16, 2011 08:22 |
Convergence problem with simpleFoam solver on tilted channel | daev | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | December 23, 2010 17:20 |