|
[Sponsors] |
October 1, 2013, 09:45 |
error with simplefoam.
|
#1 | |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
hi
i am running simpleFoam, when arriving at time =6 i get this error, can anyone please tell me what does this mean? Quote:
|
||
October 1, 2013, 10:05 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,267
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 |
change your fvSolution solver from GMAG to another some thing else
__________________
My Personal Website (http://nimasamkhaniani.ir/) Telegram channel (https://t.me/cfd_foam) |
|
October 1, 2013, 10:16 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
can you suggest something for me?
|
|
October 1, 2013, 10:25 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,267
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 |
for example PCG
__________________
My Personal Website (http://nimasamkhaniani.ir/) Telegram channel (https://t.me/cfd_foam) |
|
October 1, 2013, 12:29 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi with PCG it works till time 642, then nothing..
Quote:
|
||
October 1, 2013, 12:44 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,267
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 |
your numerical solution diverges, you may want to check
1) your BCs 2) your fvSchemes 3) or using higher under relaxation Best Regards
__________________
My Personal Website (http://nimasamkhaniani.ir/) Telegram channel (https://t.me/cfd_foam) |
|
October 1, 2013, 12:59 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
yesh you are right.
It was my BC i should have put negative for speed, Can you please tell me what indicated to you that the solution is diverging? thanks a lot |
|
October 1, 2013, 13:10 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
|
||
October 1, 2013, 14:47 |
|
#9 | |||
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,267
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 |
well izna
first look at your continuity Quote:
However there are several ways to understand whether it converges or not. for example your residual should be decreasing or if residuals became fixed, it should be less than an specific number in OpenFoam, you can save your terminal print in a log file by following command: Quote:
Quote:
also there are other easier tools to plot residual, search in forum
__________________
My Personal Website (http://nimasamkhaniani.ir/) Telegram channel (https://t.me/cfd_foam) |
||||
October 2, 2013, 01:40 |
|
#10 | |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
thanks a lot Nima For your patience.. In a simulation where i used PCG,with simpleFOAm, i obtain the above while iteration ...is it divergence? |
||
October 2, 2013, 15:14 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,267
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 |
nope, it was not about convergence issue, i feel it's a bug in GAMG solver, i saw it before in some cases, so i suggested you to change your schemes
__________________
My Personal Website (http://nimasamkhaniani.ir/) Telegram channel (https://t.me/cfd_foam) |
|
October 4, 2013, 02:02 |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
hello Nima
thanks for the reply.. When doing a simualtion i notice that it say:" No finite volume option present" Is not that a bit abnormal? I mean normlaly we try to solve using the finite volume method...so what method is it using if not finite volume? |
|
October 4, 2013, 03:28 |
|
#13 |
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,267
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 |
nope, it returns to new OpenFOAM file Dict called fvOptions in system directory,
it seems OpenFOAM group are going to integrate some solvers options such as MRF zone or porous media, in one dict for modification.
__________________
My Personal Website (http://nimasamkhaniani.ir/) Telegram channel (https://t.me/cfd_foam) |
|
October 6, 2013, 05:08 |
|
#14 | |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
HI nima.. After 1081 iterations why sudenly error? i am soo lost here..;( |
||
October 6, 2013, 06:28 |
|
#15 |
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,267
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 |
it seems some thing is wrong in solving Matrix , i guess you need check your mesh, because PCG is almost stable solver , maybe change your preconditioner
__________________
My Personal Website (http://nimasamkhaniani.ir/) Telegram channel (https://t.me/cfd_foam) |
|
October 8, 2013, 07:04 |
|
#16 |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
hello
I am solving a 2 D case, but each time error was displayed..I am sending you my system folder can you please have a look? I am desperate here.. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/hlwk4g3bsk1zi8p/iPm_UXOZ9k |
|
October 8, 2013, 08:20 |
|
#17 |
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,267
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 |
did you check your mesh witch checkMesh command?
your fvSolution setup is OK, but as you use an steady-state solver, you may want to use relaxation to converge easier
__________________
My Personal Website (http://nimasamkhaniani.ir/) Telegram channel (https://t.me/cfd_foam) |
|
October 8, 2013, 12:50 |
|
#18 | |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
hii\
Check mesh returns okay mesh.. no skewness or aything.. I tried pisoFoam, but after 292 iterations i obtain errors... i am honestly lost now.. please do advice... what pre cond you advice? Quote:
|
||
October 8, 2013, 14:36 |
|
#19 | |
Senior Member
Nima Samkhaniani
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tehran, Iran
Posts: 1,267
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 25 |
izna look log file:
Quote:
you should monitor courant number, continuity and other variables residual! i recommend: 1- check your BC 2- off your turbulence (simulate laminar flow at first) 3- use under relaxation 4- use first order schemes
__________________
My Personal Website (http://nimasamkhaniani.ir/) Telegram channel (https://t.me/cfd_foam) |
||
October 8, 2013, 15:29 |
|
#20 |
Senior Member
izna O'connor
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 143
Rep Power: 13 |
everything is fine Nima, i checked it all.. but i think its my Boundary condition.. I am simulating in 2D my west bounday is Inlet and all threee other bounday ( ie north south and east) are Outflow.. So for this case i used
1) U folder outflow is zero gradient 2) P outflow is type fixedValue; value uniform 0; 3) k and epsilone are zero gradient 4)nut is fixed value 5) nuTilda is zero gradient do you think those values for Outflow are fine? |
|
Tags |
simplefoam stability |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
interFoam vs. simpleFoam channel flow comparison | DanM | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | January 31, 2020 16:26 |
Laminar simpleFoam and inviscid simpleFoam | herenger | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | July 11, 2013 07:27 |
Differences simpleFoam vs. pimpleFoam / RASModel.H vs turbulenceModel.H | uli | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 7 | January 26, 2013 16:01 |
Trying to run a benchmark case with simpleFoam | spsb | OpenFOAM | 3 | February 24, 2012 10:07 |
Naca0012 k-e mpirun gives fpe whereas simpleFoam not | Pierpaolo | OpenFOAM | 1 | May 8, 2010 04:08 |