|
[Sponsors] |
September 23, 2013, 00:22 |
kOmegaSST over-predict the CL when stall happens
|
#1 |
New Member
Jay
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi all,
Thanks for the wonderful CFD software first of all. I'd admit I just learned OpenFOAM just for a week. I'm working on simulating an oscillating airfoil using pimpleDyMFoam solver with kOmegaSST turbulence model. The oscillating function is: 2.1 + 8.2*sin(193*t), Reynold number is about 4e6. So it should be a light stall condition. But the results show that CL seems getting stalled very early. I packed the 0/ directories, and the CL plot as well. I set the alpha to steady 2.1 degree, CL(0.15~0.2) seems not bad comparing with experiment result. Also I tried different K or omega, the data changed a bit but still stay far from the correct results. Hope experts give me some suggestions. Thanks again. PS, I got and built the OpenFOAM from github, which would be the latest svn afaik. EDIT: Even with deep stall condition, I also got the full circle for CL. I did something totally wrong. The delay of CL does not indicate the dynamic stall phenomenon. Weird. Last edited by Juansheng; October 10, 2013 at 01:25. |
|
October 6, 2013, 06:01 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Jay
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
OK, the main problem is that I set the oscillating frequency too high (193 as posted before). After lowering that value according to reduced frequency, CL under this light stall condition was predicted correctly (see #1), although there still a bit difference between OF and experimental data.
On the deep dynamic stall, OF tends to over-predict the CL when the stall happens (#2). Is it necessary to change the turbulence model? Hope someone can give me a hint. Thanks. EDIT: After fixing dynamic viscosity and k and omega for external flows, I got a better circle. But still the CL when stall begins was over-predicted too much. see #3 image. Best, Jay Last edited by Juansheng; October 10, 2013 at 01:33. |
|
Tags |
airfoil, komegasst, oscillating, pimpledymfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OpenFOAM - Validation of Results | Ahmed | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | May 13, 2018 19:28 |
Oscillating Airfoil Poor Results at High k (reduced frequency) | dancfd | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | November 4, 2013 09:32 |
komegaSST model | stix | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | March 4, 2013 09:30 |
flatplate Turbulent BL flow, OF, kOmegaSST model | nikesh | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 0 | October 16, 2012 05:43 |
Different Results from Fluent 5.5 and Fluent 6.0 | Rajeev Kumar Singh | FLUENT | 6 | December 19, 2010 12:33 |