|
[Sponsors] |
July 7, 2013, 12:59 |
Query on SnappyHexMesh
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Vishal Nandigana
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 18 |
Dear Foamers,
I have mapped and meshed a user defined structure (generated as .stl file) inside my cylindrical geometry using SnappyHexMesh. I would like to know, if OpenFOAM describes the mapped geometry only as a boundary (or patch). Is it possible to define this structure as part of the internal domain. The reason I am asking this is because I would like to solve the following equation in the entire domain (both mapped geometry and the cylindrical domain) fvm::laplacian(eps_r(r),Phi(r)) == rho (r) where, eps_r is 80 when r != r_map (r is the mesh point location and r_map is the mesh point of the mapped structure) eps_r = 2 when r == r_map rho(r) = user defined input value depending on r Hence, I would like to know if we can define the entire system (mapped structure + cylindrical geometry) as a single domain so as to solve the problem in a single domain. Please let me know Thanks Regards, Vishal |
|
July 9, 2013, 12:19 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Artur
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 20 |
I did something similar the other day to define an AMI (arbitrary mesh interface) using an .stl file of a cylinder I generated by my own script. Here are the steps I followed:
1. import the .stl in the snappyHexMeshDict as per usual: Code:
amiCylinder.stl { type triSurfaceMesh; name amiCylinder; regions { amiCylinder { name amiCylinder; } } } Code:
features ( { file "amiCylinder.eMesh"; level 1; } ); Code:
amiCylinder { level (4 4); cellZone amiCylinder; faceZone amiCylinder; cellZoneInside inside; } Hopefully this will work for you too. |
|
July 15, 2013, 22:11 |
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
Vishal Nandigana
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
Thanks for your reply. 1. If I understand your message, the command cellzone and faceZone in the refinement surfaces when defined, would incorporate the .stl file (in your case cylinder) as part of the initial geometry defined in the blockMesh, and the combined geometry (initial geometry and .stl file) would be treated as single domain? 2. Currently, this is how my SnappyHexMesh file looks like refinementSurfaces { ssdna_equilibrated_transformed_vmd_new // NOTE: SAME NAME AS THAT GIVEN IN type triSurfaceMesh { // Surface-wise min and max refinement level level (4 5); } } I would incorporate your suggestions and would get you posted. Thanks Regards, Vishal |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Some problems about using snappyHexMesh | xiaow_g | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | April 13, 2012 06:56 |
Strange Results With snappyHexMesh | calebamiles | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | August 14, 2011 17:02 |
[snappyHexMesh] stitchMesh and snappyHexMesh | gdbaldw | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | December 23, 2009 03:09 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh query | vw.cfd | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | August 14, 2009 08:54 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh not generate mesh first time | mavimo | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | August 26, 2008 08:08 |