CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

CFD of water waves phenomena-sawteeth at the free surface + slow execution time

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 10, 2013, 13:43
Default CFD of water waves phenomena-sawteeth at the free surface + slow execution time
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13
nore5 is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

I am quite new to CFD of water waves related phenomena. Many questions are actually puzzling at the moment and I can t get answers on my own.

Let me start with the most disturbing one however This is in fact a question that may be extended to other CFD softwares. What is the reason behing having a free surface profile with some saw teeth like in the third crest of the picture attached?

I read somewhere that it might be linked to the time or space discretisation, but my step step is extremely small 0.02s for a mesh resolution of 0.01 and 0.0125 in the horizontal and vertical directions respectively around the free surface region (to fulfil the reauirement needed to resolve wave height and length by the way). The simulated wave here is a 2nd order Stokes waves of wave height 0.15 and wave period of 2.31, the water depth is 0.82s. The simulation is done using OpenFOAM.

What level of control a CFD user can have to avoid such a phenomenon?

Second big interrogation , what level of control a user have to avoid execution time that gets larger and larger? I know it is a very vague question but generally speaking what level of control one has to run a simulation in optimal time?

I am asking these questions because there are few documentation when it comes to CFD of water waves so the best practices and choices regarding time stepping, shemes, solvers, spatial discretisation are rare, CFL number choice.... Thus for a beginner it is very hard to understand why things go wrong and how they should work

I have found this link on CFX but to what extent can it be extended to openFOAM or more complicated wave simulation cases...

http://www.ipen.org.br/Artigos-congr...NA2010-141.pdf


Thank you in advance for sharing your experience and shedding some light on the topic of CFD simulations of waves transformation, propagation and interaction with strutures.

Best regards,

Nore
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ripples.jpg (10.1 KB, 17 views)
nore5 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mixerVesselAMI2D's mass is not balancing sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 June 10, 2013 10:34
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
CFX4.3 -build analysis form Chie Min CFX 5 July 13, 2001 00:19
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 January 24, 2001 22:10
Free Surface Flows / Ocean Waves / Far-field boundary conditions Sundar Prasad Main CFD Forum 5 May 4, 1999 11:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18.