|
[Sponsors] |
January 25, 2013, 13:19 |
Simulationtime for scalarTransportFoam
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Sören
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 102
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
I've just a short question about scalarTransportFoam. There are no eddys, turbulences or other transient parts in my velocity field. Now I'm simulating the distribution of a scalar in this velocity-field. The question ist when to stop the simulation? I thought about: a) measure the scalar-input and -output. When conservation of mass is reached then stop the simulation. If this is correct how would you justify this as the criterium to stop at? b) make sample-pictures at different time-steps. When there are no changes in the sample-pictures of the concentration field one can say that the simulation should be stoped. c) measure the way a scalar moves from inlet to outlet. Divide this way by the velocity (average velocity or something like this) and then you get the timestep to that you have to run the simulation. Could you give me a short feedback/comment...the answer to my initial question is also welcome Cheers Last edited by despaired student; January 26, 2013 at 16:03. |
|
January 25, 2013, 21:54 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Fumiya Nozaki
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 266
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 19 |
Hi,
If your velocity field is steady, I think the scalar distribution reaches a steady state at some time. You can monitor the time history of scalar distributions at some points using the probes function and stop simulation when variations become smaller than your criterion. I think you can estimate the approximate time needed to reach steady state by the method you wrote in c. Hope that helps, Fumiya |
|
January 26, 2013, 16:05 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Sören
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 102
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi fumiya,
thanks for your reply. You are right the probe utility should work fine in my case...haven't thought about it...my bad regards |
|
|
|