|
[Sponsors] |
November 20, 2012, 11:18 |
pimpleDyMFoam issue for pitching foil
|
#1 |
New Member
Pierre-Luc
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
I have a problem using pimpleDyMFoam when simulating a pitching hydrofoil (pitching from 0° to 15°): the solution converges but the lift coefficient is lower than expected, up to 50% ! The expected values come from CFX AND experiments so I think they are reliable. I use OpenFOAM 2.1.1 with the k-omega SST turbulence model. I have tried two different ways to obtain the pitching but both give bad results : - deforming mesh (dynamicMotionSolverFvMesh) - sliding mesh (AMI) I have read in other threads that pimpleDyMFoam may be unstable for CFL higher than 2 so I chose an adaptive time step with CFL = 1 (I have also tested fixed time steps dt=10^-5 and dt=10^-4). I have tested 3 different meshes (22k, 41k and 76k cells). I have tested 2 different angular velocities (6°/s and 63°/s). Results of all these different tests differ a little but none of them gives good results... It is strange because calculations at fixed angles of attack with simpleFoam and pimpleFoam give very good results for both lift and drag coefficients. Do you have an idea regarding this issue ? Does it come from the solver pimpleDyMFoam ? Thanks in advance, Best Regards, |
|
November 21, 2012, 04:39 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Olivier
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France, grenoble
Posts: 272
Rep Power: 18 |
hello,
I would try with fixed smaller time step. How many iteration / time do you need to converge with SimpleFoam / PimpleFoam ? => I guess your pitching is too fast to catch the physics. So try to lower time step, or look for a more coupled solver. regards, olivier |
|
November 23, 2012, 03:59 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Pierre-Luc
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I have tried with a fixed time step of 10^-6 but it still gives bad results (approximately the same as with dt=10^-5 and with the adaptive time step CFL=1). I don't think the problem comes from the time step since the 6°/s case is a quasi-static case (reduced frequency = 0.18) and should not require such small time steps. I know I should not compare the two codes, but CFX only requires dt = 10^-3 for this case... For the pimpleFoam calculation at an angle of attack of 10°, which showed good results, I used the following parameters: PIMPLE { //correctPhi yes; nOuterCorrectors 2; nCorrectors 5; nNonOrthogonalCorrectors 1; pRefCell 0; pRefValue 0; } The time step was 5x10^-4 and the lift coefficient was converged after 2000 time steps. I now try to use OF 1.6-ext to check if it gives better results (I suppose it has more experience with this kind of simulation). When you say "look for a more coupled solver", to what solver do you think ? Regards, |
|
May 23, 2017, 14:54 |
|
#4 |
New Member
tommaso da vinci
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello Everyone,
I used pimpleDyMFoam for turbomachineries, but now I am trying to simulate pitching foils. Is there a way to set pitching motion in the dynamicMeshDict? Maybe do you know other ways? Thank you in advance, Tom |
|
Tags |
foil, lift and drag, pimpledymfoam, pitching |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Floating point exception with pimpleDyMFoam | ebah6 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | November 1, 2017 06:58 |
Error with pimpleDyMFoam | samiam1000 | OpenFOAM | 2 | June 11, 2012 07:21 |
Pressure boundary condition issue | Vijay | FLUENT | 0 | April 6, 2012 14:35 |
Relative flux in pimpleDyMFoam | Igor_2011 | OpenFOAM | 0 | July 20, 2011 18:50 |
Meshing related issue in Flow EFD | appu | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 1 | May 22, 2011 09:27 |